Bottom line up front
Since November 2023 The Unofficial Homestuck Collection has been entangled in legal discussions with Homestuck and Andrew Hussie.1 This has gone disastrously bad, from almost the very beginning.
Since I have been persistently threatened with a spurious lawsuit, I am taking down The Unofficial Homestuck Collection’s web presence at Homestuck’s demand. At present the current set of legal demands do not affect the GitHub repository itself, so releases of the reader are still available. Some assets are also available from a copy Homestuck made of the collection — more on this later. However, the original team behind the collection (including myself) has been forced to cease maintaining it.
This was not driven by copyright concern, community relations, or any healthy professionalism, but by spite and a need for control.
Hostile takeover
In November 2023, Homestuck sent me and Bambosh (co-creators of the UHC) an offer to collaborate on The Unofficial Homestuck Collection. We initially engaged with this offer because it came with a commitment to respect the project’s independence and for the collaboration to be fully insulated from previous personal grievances.
But this pretense of constructive collaboration turned out to be false almost immediately. For the entire period of time since the first communication — now multiple years — Homestuck has used threats, lies, legal shakedowns, and other psychological pressure tactics to attempt to seize control of The Unofficial Homestuck Collection in a hostile takeover. There was never a legal basis for Homestuck to control The Unofficial collection, and so they have been attempting to use extra-legal tactics to do so.
While the archival impact is unfortunate, the main complaint here is not that we were entitled to distribute Homestuck and it’s wrong that we’ve had to stop. We have no particular legal right to reproduce or distribute the copyrighted Homestuck material, and so never assumed we would be able to continue doing it. The fact that executing the takedown demands we’ve received results in Homestuck being unreadable is a side effect of a deeper problem.
The problem is that the way Andrew acted is completely unacceptable. They demanded control over work that was not theirs, demanded we denounce their personal enemies, demanded we recant previous criticisms, and more. This was all done under a pretense of constructive collaboration with the community that turned out to be false from the beginning. Ultimately Andrew has demanded (in violation of their own assurances) that we denounce previous criticism of Homestuck management and give full managerial control over the independent Collection project over to Andrew and their chosen delegates. Under this extortion we would be required to participate in Andrew’s attempt to sweep their past professional misconduct under the rug, and we would remain subordinate to any other demands they made to use the project to attempt to control the fan community.
We have not allowed this hostile takeover to happen to the UHC. Since Andrew has fully committed to hostility towards us and fan projects in general and demanded things we cannot give them, I’m choosing to disengage rather than face a perpetual series of baseless legal attacks and other harassment.
Reluctance
My worst fear is that by explaining this I might appear at all eager to stir up trouble. I am not a rabble-rouser and I do not enjoy conflict. Even now I am focusing on capturing the important parts, which means leaving out “juicy gossip” which is exciting but not load-bearing. Unlike people in the “content industry”, for me controversy is not revenue — it actively costs me money when people read my work. I am exiting this affair with many fewer thousands of dollars and a fun new set of stress-related health issues. If I am a clout-chaser, I am the worst to ever do it.
The archive work, the collection, and everything else I’ve done surrounding Homestuck has all only been motivated by a care for the work and the people in its community. I would still care for Andrew too, had they not been the absolute worst. If I could snap my fingers and get whatever I wanted, I would not have another exciting and scandalous story to tell, I would be happily maintaining a resource that people have found valuable. I can imagine nothing I’d rather do.
But The Unofficial Homestuck Collection is a community project, and project maintainer is a leadership position that comes with responsibilities. When people are harmed they’re entitled to clear and honest communication about what happened. Which, in this case, was very bad. I also feel a responsibility in cases like this to be transparent because doing so may help protect the safety of others.
I am also going to have to describe conversations I had with people, which I am loathe to do. One of the things I pride myself in is my ability to keep confidence, and I’d never discuss private conversations unless there are extraordinary circumstances. This is an extraordinary circumstance: not only did the parties involved already repeatedly violate my trust in eager attempts to harm me, keeping this kind of information secret has been a tactic they abuse to protect themselves from accountability.
Being Cooperative to a Fault
I have done everything I can to avoid this contingency, to the point of folly.
I have been very careful to keep the door open to the original collaboration as promised or another amicable resolution. Homestuck rejected this continually and repeatedly. At no point did The Unofficial Homestuck Collection ask for any money or favors, or do anything other than offer to give them work for free. Any attempts to work constructively were violently shut down in favor of Andrew pursuing a personal vendetta and ultimately demanding absolute control of the project. Andrew could have also simply dropped the issue and returned to the status quo of the UHC operating unlicensed, but they refused to do this.
I maintained a frog-and-the-scorpion dynamic: I was the frog,2 taking a gamble and giving the scorpion a ride it needs. Andrew’s the scorpion: if they could overcome their nature, they get nice things for free. If they couldn’t, they’d sink themselves. For me it was just a matter of swimming Andrew to the goal and hoping they wouldn’t sink everything. I wanted to make the most generous possible effort in order to see if Andrew can possibly be reasoned with. They cannot. As the frog to their scorpion I tanked seven or eight hits that each should have been fatal. Every time they made a request we gave them what they wanted, but they rarely did. It always came back to a lie or a threat. Every question, every concern, every suggestion from us was met with outright hostility. I cannot overstate how much Andrew has dug in their teeth and chose the path of most resistance, every time, even when it meant destroying themselves to do it.
Offensive behavior
Regardless of how it was done an assault on the collection is a tragic loss. But the way Andrew went about doing it has been vile.
I have been astonished at the extent Homestuck is willing to flagrantly lie, manipulate, extort, and otherwise try to use bullying and pressure tactics in order to gain power over others. I was already skeptical about Homestuck’s project management skills from my postmortems of other projects, but I had never gotten such a close look at how truly brazen and malicious it all is. The shamelessness of it all has been genuinely shocking.
The concerns I brought up about Hiveswap amounted to one blip of data. Since then, I’ve been privy to many, many more incidents that form a clear line. I have it on good authority that what I’m going to describe here isn’t an isolated incident; I’ve confirmed this has happened to other people, with other projects, with other sets of demands. The constant factor is the abuse of power. This isn’t just what they did, it’s what they’re like.
Andrew themself is a manipulative, and controlling: a matured and competent bully. The systems they build around themselves are designed to mask this behind plausible deniability. Because of Andrew/Homestuck’s almost mythological status, people are willing to extend them a lot of good faith, and they very aggressively exploit that. They are practiced at manipulation and use social and legal pressure in order to control others, especially people they view as problems.
Explicitly, the action taken against The Unofficial Homestuck Collection was not based on a good-faith attempt to protect Andrew’s rights, but was instead direct retaliation. This was the case not just with me but with Bambosh, someone Andrew had no complaint with until Bambosh didn’t yield to their demands. Even the slightest lack of deference was enough to make Andrew treat him like an enemy too. There is no material copyright complaint here, copyright is only a legal tool being weaponized. They made it clear throughout the process that they approve of the collection and want it to continue to exist. But they also wanted full control over it. Takedowns and similar demands were only ever used to apply pressure to force people to behave socially in the way Andrew demanded. This approach seems to have been their standard operating procedure for many years.
Andrew creates a coercive environment where they have a high degree of control over people. The various tactics Andrew employed with the UHC are all in a pursuit of the same common end we see in so much of their other behavior: getting people under their thumb. They manage power over people which they use to reward friends and punish enemies. I totally understand how they’ve gotten away with treating people like this. It’s practiced, effective manipulation. If I hadn’t already had it impressed on me that Andrew was a bad-faith actor I needed to be vigilant around, it’d probably have worked on me too.
If you are one of the people who have worked with Andrew in the past and this description does not ring true for you, I am happy for you. Unfortunately that does not change the fact that Andrew behaves this way with many others. If Andrew treated you decently, consider that if Andrew had treated others with the same decency there would be no problem, and we would all be much better off for it.
Abridged
This will necessarily be abridged. Unlike past reporting where I’ve had to draw conclusions from what little material was published, this has been a multiple-year ordeal and I have comprehensive documentation of every offense that took place along the way. If I covered every offense committed by Hussie/Homestuck as part of this process, that explanation would be longer than all the Hiveswap work put together. This is a summary, but trust me, there is no secret message buried in the cracks where they say it’s opposite day and they were actually cool and good the whole time.
One common motif I’ve had to edit around are platitudes that turn out to be demonstrably false a few moments later. There are a lot of them, and every time I include one I have to go back and note that it wasn’t true, or it sounds like I’m presenting it as fact. So it’s a lot of “that wasn’t true, that wasn’t true, that wasn’t true…” wasted on non load-bearing thoughts, and that just turns into speed bumps.
Background
The Collection
If you’re not already familiar with The Unofficial Homestuck Collection, here’s the quick technical summary. The Unofficial Homestuck Collection (UHC) is an offline archive and reader for Homestuck and its related works. The collection was originally written by Bambosh approx. 2019-2020, and released 10/25/2020.
Homestuck referenced several websites that no longer exist and used deprecated technologies like Flash, and so it requires special restoration for people to read it.
Special restoration is especially needed for people to read Homestuck now, as the homestuck.com
website went offline entirely in early 2025.
I had actually been working on developing an equivalent program at the same time, so shortly after the release of the UHC I contacted Bambosh and offered to help polish and expand the collection. I’ve been working with him on the project ever since. Since 2021 I am formally a “co-creator” of the project, and the Application was owned and copyrighted jointly between us.
The collection is licensed under GPL 3.0 with a §7 attribution clause. This just means anyone can contribute to the project, or modify it, or create a new spin-off version, as long as their changes allow other people to continue doing that. Because of the creative material represented, the §7 clause also requires crediting information to be retained in any copies or spinoffs.
The UHC has been an extremely rewarding project for me because of how much the community has appreciated it. Any time I see people talking about starting or re-reading Homestuck, I always see someone in the comments point them to the UHC, which really is incredible. The little utilitarian value function in my head is so happy with the reception the project got, not just because it’s a fan-favorite, but because of how much the whole community has really appreciated it being out there.
Asset Layer Cake
The Unofficial Homestuck Collection is split into two components: the reader program and the asset pack. It’s a simplified version of the emulator/ROM dichotomy. The reader is the application itself; it manages everything about the reading experience such as progress tracking and the new reader mode. The asset pack is a static archive of the relevant comic material.
The reader program is designed to be non-infringing: it’s all original work and doesn’t reproduce copyrighted material.3 The “Unofficial” in the title also clearly marks it as unaffiliated with Homestuck, so there’s no trademark issue either. The reader project is not part of “Homestuck”, it is original work that we own.
The asset pack is a little weirder. It’s a compilation of Homestuck content, of course, but not anything that was ever behind a paywall: everything that’s there is just an archive of material that was already published for free. But in the eyes of the law it is still a reproduction of Homestuck’s copyrighted material, so Andrew et al. would be within their rights to require folks to stop hosting it, if they chose to attack the project.
In summary, Homestuck (and Viz Media, for a time) always had every right to force us to stop distributing the asset pack. That constitutes making reproductions of Homestuck, which they have the exclusive right over. However the reader application is entirely new work, and the Homestuck IP does not have any special claim over it.
Endorsement
Fortunately, when it came out, Andrew didn’t attack it. In fact we saw the opposite. There was a stir at launch about people involved with the official team praising and recommending the UHC, which culminated in Andrew Hussie themselves updating his only web presence at the time to point to it:
Andrew even came back to Twitter to agree that the UHC was “100% the best way to read Homestuck”:
So that’s where this story starts: the creator of the original work telling the public their version of their own work is broken and people should use the fan archive instead. We are not entitled to make reproductions of Homestuck but we have been given a blessing. By the time we get to the end of the story the official website will have been fully abandoned in favor of sending people to this collection. The one power Andrew has is to try to take down the asset pack, but in this case they actively like the collection and wants to see it remain up.
First approach – October 2023
Around June 2023, Bambosh and I got the first hint that someone might be looking to contact us in an official capacity, and the project email account got a message in October.
This was notably late to be getting official communication; the UHC released in 2020 and exploded in popularity then, but here we were seeing first communications about it in 2023.
As previously noted, Homestuck spent this time endorsing The Unofficial Homestuck Collection.
This delay turned out to be due to Andrew un-partnering with Viz in October, which gave Andrew control over the homestuck.com
website.
So if they wanted to fix the website, now they can. More on this later.
In October 2023, Bambosh and I get this email:
Miles (rcktpwrr), 2023-10-01 Hey there!
My name’s Miles and I hope this isn’t too out of the blue, but I’m reaching out to you because of your awesome work on the Unofficial Homestuck Collection.
I’m working on an upcoming Homestuck project and we’re sort of getting some stuff in gear, and Andrew mentioned that it’d be super cool to do a little work with you at some point in the future if that’s something you’d be amenable to. Andrew loves the Collection and thinks it’d be pretty cool to work with it in the future; he even has some ideas for contributions of content he’d love to add to the collection.
Would you be at all comfortable chatting with me on Discord sometime, and we can talk a little more details on this and maybe get you talking with Andrew at some point? You can reach me at [redacted] on Discord and pop me a message literally any time!
Also, just to be clear, we’re hoping to keep the work we’re doing private for right now, so Andrew and the team would super appreciate it if you kept this under your belt until we have a chance to explain a little more about the kind of things we wanna do. Sorry to be so cloak and dagger about it, hahaha.
Please feel free to write back or hit me on Discord literally whenever, but we’re looking forward to hearing from you!
Best, Miles
Takeaways:
- This is before the relaunch of Homestuck^2: Beyond Canon and the start of the Homestuck Independent Creative Union, so the name Miles is new.
- A team working with Andrew is working on a project and would like us to collaborate on it.
- This project, and possibly Andrew working on projects in general, is still secret
- This team would later be revealed as the HICU.
- Andrew loves the collection
As far as official responses go, this is pretty good! If this had been true all would still be well.
Good Faith
Given what we know about how Homestuck has historically acted, the safest thing to do at this point would’ve been to tell them to go pound sand. But, it was also possible that things were actually changing internally at Homestuck for the better, which would delight me.
Homestuck and The Unofficial Homestuck Collection were in a position to collaborate for mutual benefit. There is not a hierarchical relationship here. Homestuck was in a position to give the UHC a license to distribute the asset pack, promotion, and development support. The UHC was in the position to use UHC work in an official Homestuck website, give Homestuck a working archive of its inaccessible work, promote the Homestuck brand, and give Homestuck a license to use the UHC reader beyond the GPL. This was also a key opportunity for Homestuck to publicly legitimize the HICU by visibly working with its community and not against it.
There are three basic possible outcomes:
- Win/Win: Andrew has the HICU work collaboratively with the existing fan project. Maybe we put together licensing that lets us distribute the asset pack, or maybe we fold the thing into an official project with new licensing.4 There are many mutually-beneficial options here.
- Neutral: Homestuck doesn’t have to pursue any action here at all. They can continue to allow the collection to be distributed as it was, but retain the ability to take it down at any time if they want.
- Lose/Lose: Andrew demands an arrangement that’s not mutually beneficial. They think they can take control of the project, or compel me to give him a blank check, or whatever. I refuse, Andrew takes legal action, I take down the project. I put together a report on what happens (you are here), it’s revealed how bad Andrew was, the UHC is harder for anyone to use including Homestuck.
This process started before the HICU and before “free licenses” were being talked about, and so I was fully ready to license the UHC by paying money out-of-pocket. I would have (and, in fact did) make personal sacrifices to make this work.
But I’m not dumb. There’s a requirement on us to be responsible about what commitments we make.
The Unofficial Homestuck Collection is a community project. It’s not just my work, it’s the work of dozens of community members. As the maintainer of the project I’m responsible for doing right by the whole project and everyone who trusts me to maintain it, including both its contributors and its users.
Part of what it means to be a responsible and trustworthy member of the community is not being negligent. I can’t make agreements that put valuable resources like The Unofficial Homestuck Collection at risk just because it would be easier for me to trust someone, especially when their trustworthiness is already in question.
If Andrew made a bad deal with Viz that resulted in them not doing right by the website, that’s Andrew’s neglectful error. If I make a bad deal that lets Andrew not do right by the collection, that’s my neglectful error.
But what I have here is a very, very good deal for Andrew. It’s a free house for you, Jim! We’ve done this enormous amount of work for free, and we were happy to keep doing it in ways that more directly profited him. The only requirement we ever had is that we would be working with Homestuck, not for Homestuck. To unilaterally hand a community project over would be to treat its many collaborators inappropriately and ultimately compromise the work.
If Andrew doesn’t see this as primarily being about asserting dominance over an enemy, this should be easily navigable. If they can only play dominance games, it’ll collapse. I was always pushing to do the kind of collaboration they approached us to do, but I was never willing to cross the line into predicating any work on some public humiliation ritual.
If Andrew wants to help us they can. If they want us to give him our help they can have it for free. If they want to control us they can’t. It’s that simple.
It is a perfect instance of the dynamic of the scorpion and the frog. I’m the frog, taking a gamble and giving the scorpion a ride it needs. Andrew’s the scorpion: if they can overcome their nature, they get nice things for free. If they don’t, they sinks themselves. For me it was just a matter of swimming Andrew to the goal and hoping they wouldn’t sink everything.
At the time James Roach was the person most visibly handling the day-to-day handling of Homestuck operations, and from what I’d seen of him he seemed completely professional and reasonable. So if we would be working with him this could easily work out. My expectation from the beginning was that the more Andrew involved themselves the more they would shoot themselves (and therefore the project) in the foot. So the emphasis placed on Andrew’s minimal involvement made us think we could avoid this problem, and maybe someone else even understood it too. What they said throughout the introductory phase — and the fact that they were asking to work with me at all — indicated that was the case, although this would later turn out to be false.
So we took the responsible route: we decided to allow them to prove their goodwill by being as cooperative and friendly as possible without creating vulnerabilities that a bad actor could exploit. I was going to try to pursue a mutually-beneficial collaboration, but I was going to be sure that in doing so I wasn’t leaving myself open to being exploited. Good faith without being negligent. I still think this was the right approach, even though it came at significant personal expense.
Introductions and Context – October 2023
We reached out to Miles via Discord6 shortly after getting the email. The tone7 was friendly and casual, and overwhelmingly positive about our work so far and the continued health of the collection, as well as the continued direction of me and Bambosh.
…
- miles
- but yeah thanks so much for getting back to us so quickly! i think itd be really cool to link up and do some work together with the Collection, i know andrew has some ideas for contributions as well
- assuming, of course, that you’re amenable to that! it’s your baby, we don’t wanna do anything you arent comfortable with
- but we can cover the details later, at any rate im just glad you check that email address LOL
…
- Bambosh
- And yeah, definitely open to any suggestions.
- Gio’s whole thing was that he approached me with a bunch of good ones and like dang I’m definitely not gonna turn down the help Basically all the new stuff since the original release was his work
…
- Bambosh
- He’ll literally just DM me out of nowhere like “hey check out this whole ass thing I did” and it’s awesome every time
- miles
- sweet LOL
- by the way! on the topic of privacy, hermit life, etc
- at the risk of sounding a bit cloak-and-dagger, would you mind keeping the fact that we reached out to you under wraps for a little bit?
- basically just until we’ve worked out more of whatever this is going to be and the stuff we’ll be doing together hehe
- Bambosh
- Absolute zipperlips - though can we get Gio in on it as well? For the aforementioned Valuable Working Partner reasons
- miles
- yeah for sure! as youve mentioned gio is a big contributor so we expect you both to be locked in here as the conversation coalesces around what it is we’re gonna be doing together
- For Now, if possible, id appreciate it if you kept it to yourself just because i wanna make sure i have the go-ahead from andrew to loop whoever you feel is relevant in, but again, it’s your project and i can’t imagine gio wouldnt be on it as well
- i’d ask him right now but i think he’s out doing something LOL
…
- miles
- also! just wanna let you know, in the next couple days before andrew and i start chatting with you guys about what it is we wanna get into with you and sharing ideas, we are probably going to ask you to sign an NDA! the reason i tell you this now is just so that i can take the time to personally assure you that this is not some scary legal bullshit and we have no interest in like, being weird or punitive about shit, we just wanna do our due diligence to make sure that the privacy of the projects is respected
- if you have any questions at all about the document when the time comes, please dont hesitate to ask me
Takeaways:
- Andrew/Miles (later explained as the HICU) wants to “do some work together with the Collection” and “make contributions” to the project
- This is all to be at our discretion: they promised not to do anything with the project we weren’t comfortable with
- I am introduced in the very first conversation as being key to the project and it’s completely expected for us to be a package deal. It’s clear Homestuck is fine with this
- There is an NDA to keep things secret, but there will absolutely not be any “punitive legal bullshit”
Roles and Agents
Andrew forces people to be intentionally vague about an enormous amount of important information as a power play. That includes who all is acting in what exact role, requiring me to do additional untangling here to explain it.
Miles is here as a representative of Homestuck, Inc. and Andrew Hussie. Consistently, Miles acts as a direct proxy for Andrew’s intent (sometimes copy-pasting his actual messages), which is why I’m treating Andrew and Miles as a unit. Miles sometimes attempts to do some persuasion on Andrew’s behalf, but this is done as an empowered agent. There were a few personal conversations I had with Miles, but he went out of his way to clearly mark those as speaking on his own behalf, in contrast to his usual role as a direct proxy for Andrew.
…
- miles
- i’ll let andrew know!
- GiovanH
- have you noticed you have the job of “priest”
- miles
- LMAO
- low priest
- ive never heard it put that way but i love the comparison
- GiovanH
- it seems like a good gig
- miles
- gives me an excuse to say “andrew works in mysterious ways”
As a member of the HICU Miles is straddled in what should be a tricky position with conflicts of interest, except that the labels are mostly fake. Andrew is the interest that counts and everything else is smoke and mirrors.
When they later try to make a distinction between Andrew and the HICU, Miles continues to represent Andrew while James Roach essentially represents himself in a management role at the HICU, although it turns out the structure of the HICU allows Andrew to overrule him on any point.
- GiovanH
- (@miles real quick before I get too deep into details here, you’re speaking on behalf of Andrew/Homestuck Inc here, correct?)
- miles
- yes im speaking on behalf of andrew
…
- JAMES
- also for the record, since it seems like thats kind of an important point: i dont represent andrew legally or even personally im just sort of here to kind of help out where i can as an interested party in the longevity and wellbeing of homestuck as a whole
- GiovanH
- (yeah, I’m conceptualizing james as being here for the hicu, basically)
- JAMES
- much more interested now that i’m sort of at the helm of some stuff, my name and reputation being very intimately tied to the property at this point
As a rule Andrew has refused to directly use his name for anything. To maintain plausible deniability, maybe. It’s a cheap stunt and I’m not letting you fall for it. When I talk about “Homestuck” as an actor, I’m talking about Andrew Hussie or a duely appointed representative. Andrew, ultimately, is responsible for these choices. If occasionally Miles or James or some other layer of Homestuck management was the one to type a message, it doesn’t matter. Andrew has final say, Andrew set up the management to work the way it does, and Andrew is ultimately responsible for events they cause.
I know the Joker’s Trick here is to set Miles up to take the entire fall when this goes south, but that’s a sad ploy and you’re not going to fall for it this time. No more of this plausible deniability human buffer crumple zone trickery. It’s just Andrew’s decisions, sometimes with a human shield if Andrew thinks it’ll benefit themself.
You Know Gio’s Here, Right?
So, there is an obvious elephant in the room, which is the fact that I’ve been a harsh critic of Andrew Hussie’s professional behavior before and they took it very poorly. Andrew specifically said that he’d never have anything to do with me and implied I was a stalker and sex pest. So this conversation happening at all was weird, and it was even weirder how this was insistently painted as a complete non-issue.
As for my side of things, I had thought this through before we replied to the original email. For the sake of the project, since there was the potential to do real good on the table, I had decided to take an attitude of “agree to disagree” and simply not make it an issue. I’m already working on The Unofficial Homestuck Collection without letting my personal frustrations impact the work. I could work with Andrew as long as they were being reasonable, and if they insisted on bringing up old hostilities in a way I couldn’t brush past, we would have to part ways on the project.
But Andrew rejecting my involvement — or even instigating hostilities over it — would deny them goodwill and access to The Unofficial Homestuck Collection. There was never any possibility where him refusing to work with me would end up with him getting control of the project and me leaving it. If they wanted to work, we could work, but they would have to at least tolerate working with the people in charge of the project, as is obviously the case for anyone wanting to collaborate with anyone.
I wasn’t expecting to be working much with Andrew, though. It seemed much more likely I would be working on projects through James Roach, or Miles, and that would have been my preference anyway. So it caught me off guard when Andrew wanted to communicate with both of us privately.
- miles
- the way we tend to do things in terms of folks the HICU is collaborating with is as follows
- once (or if) you guys do feel comfortable signing the NDA, andrew and i are going to chat with each of you one on one. one at a time
- think of it as like. idk i guess an interview?
- not that we need your Credentials because your work speaks for itself, its just that andrew likes to have a chat with folks as well in a semi-formal setting so that he can be on top of everyone we collab with
- again for reasons of, yknow, privacy comfort etc
- so when the time comes, we’re gonna basically wait for you to sign the NDA (we’ll get another draft to you before then and ofc no need to sign until we’ve agreed on the form that’s gonna take), then we’re going to chat with bambosh, then we’re gonna chat with gio, and then probably after that we’re all gonna chat as a foursome
- Bambosh
- That sounds agreeable to me
- miles
- cool!
- GiovanH
that seems like a terrible idea- Bambosh
- :O
- miles
- ?
- GiovanH
- that will be the most uncomfortable conversation I’ve ever had in my life
- miles
- really?
- GiovanH
- but okay? if he wants???
- miles
- can i ask why itd be uncomfortable?
- GiovanH
- the last thing andrew said about me is “I don’t trust him, I will never speak to him, and probably no one from WP ever will either.”
- so I was just planning on granting him blanket permission to skip that part if he wanted
…
- GiovanH
- if he wants to, I’ll do it.
- i’m just anticipating that being extra interesting
- miles
- i mean speaking frankly i cant imagine andrew has any desire to get “interesting” about anything LOL, we just wanna chat with folks and work with you guys via the protocols we have in place to make sure the team is comfortable
…
- miles
- yeah no worries, again we’re here chatting now because i wanna get the ball rolling on how you guys are feeling
- but yeah at that point its gonna be the sign -> chat pipeline, and beyond that theres nothing more we really wanna do
…
- GiovanH
- feelings-wise, for me having criticized someone does not mean I’m unwilling to work with them. (obviously)
- miles
- so for whatever its worth, andrew knew you were a big contributor on this before we reached out, its not even close to a dealbreaker
- GiovanH
- by this point I figured he must have
- miles
- yeah! like
- i guess what im getting at here is that we wanna work with you, we like what you guys are doing, and we definitely dont have any intention of getting weird about this lol
Takeaways:
- Miles emphasizes yet again that my involvement is a non-issue, to the point of acting confused by my hesitancy
- They know really thoroughly that I’m a major contributor to the project and that wasn’t ever going to be a dealbreaker
- Yet more promises that nothing should be unpleasant or hostile, they triple-promise not to be weird about it
This absolute commitment that there would be no discrimination against me over past disputed complaints is the only reason either of us were willing to engage in any of this in the first place. It was the premise of everything that came after. Every time you see them contradict this basis represents an absolute forfeit of credibility and integrity from them. It is the whole game lost each time. I need you to really, really commit this to memory. Put an extra copy up next the article. This foundation is going to slip through your fingers so fast it’ll seem bizarre it was ever there.
Andrew agreeing to work with me without making an incident of it was the mature thing to do, but still unexpected. I had made the decision that the responsible way to handle a working relationship with Homestuck would to be to make it a point not to try to abuse my position to try to rehash old conflicts or “balance the books”, and instead just work on individual projects where we could find mutually-beneficial arrangements. Homestuck was promising it would do the same. Trucies.
Within those extremely minimal playing rules, I was completely willing to put bad blood behind us and work constructively. Maybe this was naiveté, but I prefer to think of it as insisting on acting in responsible good faith. If something went wrong, it was going to be because someone attacked me, not because I refused.
Homestuck Independent Creative Union
Miles had been very secretive about what actual plans there were, saying we needed to be under NDA first. At a high level that makes sense, so we talked about the structure of this new HICU while we reviewed the waiver, which includes an incredibly broad non-disclosure agreement.
I spend a lot of time emphasizing how important it is that this doesn’t hijack any existing work (because the language of the waiver indicates that it will), and Miles goes out of his way to reassure us that it won’t be.
…
- miles
- can you tell me what kind of conflicts you guys are concerned about?
- i wanna make sure i can assuage your worries as best i can but itll help me to understand what your concerns are
…
- GiovanH
- in general, making sure the UHC stays an independent project, and not assigning Homestuck/Viz/whoever rights over the software/editorial decisions/etc
- miles
- okay cool cool
- anything else jump out at you guys?
- GiovanH
- Big picture, I’m okay with an NDA to keep any New Unreleased Happenings secret
- miles
- alrighty
Despite all this lip service, the first draft of the “Homestuck Community Participation and Release Agreement” itself contained an attempt to strip signatories of creative independence. The original waiver had an intellectual property provision that forces “all creative concepts, stories, characters, settings, dialogue, project ideas, plans, and all other information related to the Homestuck intellectual property” to be bound by the licensing contract between the HICU and Homestuck, Inc., which is a separate, secret document we were not allowed to see until after committing to it. This would turn any signatory into a “poison contributor” who couldn’t work on any independent fanwork.
- GiovanH
can you give me an example of a scenario you’re worried about?
- ok for example
You understand and agree that all creative concepts, stories, characters, settings, dialogue, project ideas, plans, and all other information related to the Homestuck intellectual property discussed by Group are bound by the conditions described in the licensing agreement between the Union and Homestuck, Inc. All information is deemed Confidential Information.
- this seems overbroad, and would (accidently?) capture all “information related to the Homestuck intellectual property” that we discuss with each other, including UHC work, as the IP of Homestuck Inc
- as well as fanwork and other stuff
- which I don’t think is anyone’s intent, but that’s a kill-switch I don’t want to make
…
- miles
- i can go ahead and have a look at that line and get back to you about maybe striking it, because i totally see your concern, even though i can straight up promise you man to man (whatever thats worth) that we have no intention of operating that way
- because again, we’d love to work with you guys if that’s in the cards for us
- Bambosh
- That would be excellent if you can make it happen
- miles
- i can totally talk to andrew about it
At our request, we had this line struck from the participation waiver, since the purpose of the NDA in the first place was to allow us to discuss project plans together, and once a basic goal was established a sensible license could be drawn up around that. Even though what was struck was the absurd “blank check” clause — where they commit you to follow a separate document you’re not allowed to read first — they still grumbled about making this exception.
There’s a lot more wrong here, but a full analysis of the release document is outside the scope of this story.
We also get an early description of the union here which matches the description the HICU would later give itself:
- GiovanH
- also, is the Union the same as the Group, or is there a managment layer? I wasn’t clear on that from the doc
- miles
- so to get colloquial about it, the Union is basically like
- the collective of Homestuck Contributors
…
- miles
- if it helps, think of the HICU as an actual union.
Beyond Canon, About About the Homestuck Independent Creative Union
The Homestuck Independent Creative Union (HICU) is a union of creative contributors which was established to consolidate members of future Homestuck Projects, beginning with the launch of Homestuck: Beyond Canon.
The HICU is a totally independent entity from Andrew, What Pumpkin, VIZ Media, or any other corporate interest. Andrew has given the union a free license, so they may legally work within the full Homestuck universe and monetize their efforts to support the members. The union is both creatively and financially independent, and no outside individuals or companies are receiving any royalties or payments. Only the members benefit, and income will be distributed among members as equitably as possible.
Andrew is not creatively involved with these projects in any direct way, but remains available to the union for consultation at their request.
First, they’re calling themselves a union of creatives. Although not a formal labor union, they’re committing to act like a labor union: “an organization of workers formed for the purpose of serving the members’ interests with respect to wages and working conditions.” The HICU is bound to represent the interests of its members, not Homestuck’s. They immediately establish that they’re entirely separate and distinct from any existing structures — including Andrew Hussie. Separate entities, separate responsibilities, separate interests. We’re supposed to treat the union like a union.
If you’re paying close attention, you’ll notice another problem here: why is Andrew involved in Union business? If the Union is really independent of Homestuck and Andrew, why is Andrew intimately involved in the basic process of onboarding people to the union? That’s an immediate conflict of interest.
In fact, why is Andrew involved in any business related to Homestuck at all? What Pumpkin announced not only that Andrew left What Pumpkin in 2020, but that they chose to “fully discontinue their creative involvement in any future Homestuck projects”.
It will turn out later that all these labels — “What Pumpkin”, “Homestuck, Inc.”, “The Silence Mill”, “the Homestuck Independent Creative Union” — they’re all a shell game. The HICU isn’t at all what it says it is; Miles misrepresenting the union from day one, and the union itself continued lying about their independence on their webpage for years. But that’s another story.
Commentary contribution
Part of the sell here is Homestuck making the pitch that working with them would allow us to do genuinely useful things. What kinds of things was Homestuck looking to contribute, besides official support? I was always keeping in mind the possibility of using the UHC, or a version of the UHC, to replace or supplement the Homestuck website.
But one of the first things Homestuck pitched to entice us was this: it turns out the rest of the Homestuck commentary is finished, and it’s just been locked in a vault. This is the commentary they already committed to releasing as part of the book collection they and Viz announced and failed to complete.
…
- miles
- but as regards the collection, one of the things i think is okay to let you guys know is that andrew thinks itd be cool to get the last of his author’s commentary in the collection
- which would actually be Exclusive to the collection!
- GiovanH
- Oh, that would be very cool. I wasn’t sure if that had been written, actually
- miles
- heh they totally have
- and because viz isn’t really doing the books anymore, the collection seems like it might be the best of all possible homes for them
- but there are some other ideas andrew is playing with that could crystallize as we work together with you guys and the Collection
That’s the kind of juice I would never share under any reasonable condition (even though it was never under an NDA.) But Homestuck has crossed too many lines, and that context is an important part of the story, so there’s the reveal. The work is all done, Andrew’s just been keeping it locked away. Possibly just as a card they was holding onto to someday dangle as raw bait?
The HICU NDA Deadlock – October-June 2023
The basic schedule is this: Bambosh signs the HICU waiver and onboards with Andrew, then I do the same, then we start discussing plans properly. We still haven’t even discussed what they want to do in any detail, since that’s a project they want covered by NDA. So the NDA has to come first for both of us before we can start discussing ideas at all, let alone make any commitments.
Bambosh gets his agreement signed but Andrew is on vacation, so it’ll be a while before there’s further progress. (There is an “Andrew vacation” between most of the pauses in this timeline; I’ll try to omit them.)
- miles
- so when the time comes, we’re gonna basically wait for you to sign the NDA (we’ll get another draft to you before then and ofc no need to sign until we’ve agreed on the form that’s gonna take), then we’re going to chat with bambosh, then we’re gonna chat with gio, and then probably after that we’re all gonna chat as a foursome
…
- miles
- yeah no worries, again we’re here chatting now because i wanna get the ball rolling on how you guys are feeling
- but yeah at that point its gonna be the sign -> chat pipeline, and beyond that theres nothing more we really wanna do
…
- GiovanH
- @miles based on what you’ve said I’m assuming you’ll have an NDA for me roughly immediately after bambosh signs his?
- miles
- hey! yeah that’s pretty much the game plan, bambosh signs and we pop an NDA to you afterwards, we have our conversations etc and from there we can talk shop
…
…
- Bambosh
- Alright, signed on my end
- Bambosh
- Time to chill for a few weeks
Crucially, from this point on, I am cut out of any discussions Miles, Bambosh, and Andrew have behind closed doors, because they claim every aspect of conversation is covered by the NDA.
…
- miles
- yeah there are probably more talks to come before you guys explicitly are under license
- about things such as this, the direction the UHC (or, perhaps, the HC) would go
- GiovanH
- I have quite a few licensing thoughts but I assume those will have to wait until NDA’d
- miles
- definitely LOL
…
- GiovanH
- yeah it’s weird trying to make plans when we’re disjointed
the HC
- no don’t you’ll break everything
- where am I gonna put the star
- miles
- at any rate ill get to andrew about getting you the NDA to sign so we can chat as a fearsome foursome
Beyond Canon
Just a few days after this (while Andrew was still on vacation), the Beyond Canon reboot announcement and new site went live.
Miles himself would shortly after be confirmed to be a writer on HS:BC himself:
Meet the Team — Posted on 25 October 2023 by James What can I say about Miles? Miles has known Andrew and I for years, and has such a natural and charismatic charm to him. I knew him largely as a comedy writer before this but seeing him pour himself into worldbuilding and plot mapping has really inspired me. Miles brings an important element to the team, in that he’s kind of a bro. The kind of guy that could probably best some kind of beast in singular combat. His favorite guys are Equius and Dirk. You really need that kind of energy sometimes. Miles’s writing is so full of character and charm. I’m excited for you all to see what he has to offer. I personally think this project could not exist without him.
NDA Deadlock
This is when we get the first major stall to the project, and it’s caused by Miles and Andrew trying to pull another fast one with licensing.
Now that Andrew has Bambosh behind closed doors, instead of moving on to the next step of giving me an NDA to sign and onboarding me, they cut me off entirely and start putting pressure on Bambosh to write them a blank check. At this point, the NDA makes it impossible for us to coordinate and communicate, so it serves here to isolate and corner a victim who is unable to communicate the aggression to the outside world. I keep asking to also be allowed to sign the same NDA, but am always rebuffed.
We already knew the NDA clause in the waiver was extremely broad, but we didn’t know if the intent was to protect peoples’ privacy as we were told, or if the plan was to weaponize it. We now know the purpose of the NDA was to be weaponized because that’s how Andrew immediately used it.
With this trap set up, Andrew tries to get Bambosh to sign more paperwork and commit the project to a new, secret set of terms under a new previously-undiscussed license. This is an intentional violation of the previously proposed schedule — Bambosh is only supposed to be doing a nominal interview here, not getting pressured to agree to a new set of terms. They’re demanding a blank check before we even sit down to talk ideas. Basic divide-and-conquer, executed by someone whose goal turns out to be to conquer.
- GiovanH
- speaking of which, any paperwork updates for me yet?
- i know you were doing it staggered
- miles
- yeah i think we may or may not be doing one more meeting with bambosh, who has some paperwork of his own to look through, before we move forward
…
- GiovanH
- If that’s uhc-related paperwork that’s usually something I deal with and/or w/ bambosh, fyi
- Bambosh
- Yeah, that’s kinda where the discussions gonna go when I get back from lawyer stuff
- GiovanH
- <- fake internet lawyer
- Bambosh
- Like, even if the paperwork is good I can’t sign anything if I can’t even talk it over with this guy here
- GiovanH
- heyo
- but yes definitely talk with real lawyers too
- miles
- yeah we wanted to give you a chance to go to like, an actual legal expert, who will be able to assure you that this license is legit LOL
The manipulation and pressuring comes in a number of forms: social pressures, pointing out the possibility of Viz Media going after unlicensed work, and ultimately making his own direct legal threats.
The line became that Bambosh had to sign a license before anything could continue. This is obviously untrue, not only because they just finished saying the opposite thing, but because the licensing details are heavily dependent on what the project is, which was yet to even be discussed. This time is not being used to try to continue project discussions without me or otherwise nudge me out of the project, Andrew is just blatantly trying to seize power via contract, and I’m being kept out to keep up the pressure and deny Bambosh any defense.
It seems like Andrew was under the impression they could exploit Bambosh as a single point of failure who could be pressured into giving up the project. But that didn’t work, and not just because Bambosh isn’t a fool, but because that’s simply not how the project is structured. Since we’re co-owners, this can’t happen. Neither of us can make any major decisions about the project without consulting with each other. Bambosh doesn’t want to and doesn’t have the authority to, and we designed it that way on purpose. Bambosh cannot legally sign anything without showing the paperwork to me, which Andrew insists the NDA prevents him from doing. There is no play here; neither of us could consent to any policy changes without the consent of the other, and a unilateral change in ownership was literally impossible.
So for an extended period of time Andrew and Miles don’t allow me to review the mysterious new documents Andrew is demanding Bambosh sign, and Bambosh can’t sign them until I can review them. All progress is stonewalled by Hussie. By breaking procedure and trying to bully his way into power, Andrew has deadlocked the project.
Baring Fangs
During this wheel-spinning, Homestuck ramps up the pressure.
…
- miles
- HEY. sorry im finishing up some work shit and i just today got back from vacation so ive been catching up
- basically insofar as working with you guys on this goes, nothing has changed. we’re still amenable to your involvement on this, gio, and although i’ve seen the tone get sort of Legalesey i wanna emphasize that we’d still vastly prefer working with the UHC to any sort of takedown bullshit
- that’s not at all what we want to happen
This is a huge shift and represents Homestuck completely backtracking on every assurance they’ve given up to this point. Suddenly my involvement is something they’re still “amenable” to, not something taken as a given. But most importantly Homestuck has started brandishing legal threats as a weapon. They have gone directly from “it’s your baby, we don’t wanna do anything you arent comfortable with” to “you can either do work under whatever conditions we dictate or we’ll personally attack you.” From “I’d never hurt you” to “don’t make me hurt you.” This is a clear threat: this is no longer about forging a collaborative relationship, they’ve started waving around a loaded gun.
Note the vacillation here. They loved us before, maybe if we’d just do what they say now we’ll stay loved and they’ll stop hitting us.
Reality distortion as manipulation
But also pay attention to how this complete reversal of their position is presented explicitly as “nothing has changed”, even though this is obviously false. This gaslighting is part of the psychological manipulation I’ve come to realize is a weapon Homestuck considers to be one of its most vital tools.
Homestuck chooses to work with people who are dependent on its good graces whenever it can orchestrate such a situation. This can come from hero worship, financial dependence, or threats of legal violence. But this “upper hand” Homestuck maintains allows it to get away with these constant reality distortions, even in cases like this where it’s put everything in writing. If the victim calls them out on the lie Homestuck is able to reverse victim and attacker and treat the objection as an aggression being made against Homestuck. And in almost all cases, Homestuck has set up legal traps that make describing the lie to anyone else an offense in and of itself.
So Homestuck has gotten used to being able to distort reality like this whenever they want. It makes trying to seriously talk with Homestuck a truly absurd affair because they’ll simply demand people accept false histories of things that just happened. Miles is able to transition seamlessly from “ofc no need to sign until we’ve agreed on the form that’s gonna take” to “we aren’t going to be getting any of this work done without you guys being under license”.
“Don’t make me hurt you”
Meanwhile, Andrew has his lawyer load a cease-and-desist into the chamber so he can frame himself as “delaying” it - as if the lawyer is some uncontrollable attack dog he’s holding back, rather than a professional he’s actively paying to carry out his wishes. Lawyers don’t randomly go around C&Ding people on instinct. Those hours are billable — if the lawyer is priming a C&D, it’s because of their client’s wishes to fire it at someone.
This is an argument Homestuck makes a few times throughout this process: “We don’t want to sue you, but unless you agree to [arbitrary demand] we will have to.” It’s a threat, but it comes in this extremely manipulative wrapper.
It’s a familiar move in high-stakes legal brinkmanship: “We don’t want to go to court, but unless you agree to [arbitrary demand], we’ll have no choice.” It’s not a casual remark; it’s calculated to box the other side in. The harm is positioned as inevitable unless you concede immediately, and the blame for escalation is shifted entirely onto you.
…
- miles
- the caveat being that from the getgo there has been a point that we need you guys to understand, which is that we aren’t going to be getting any of this work done without you guys being under license. it’s just not going to happen
- bambosh needs time to check with a lawyer and so we’re amenable to giving that time, and again i think andrew is As We Speak instructing his lawyer to get the C&D delayed a while, but the problem is that we’ve seen very little from your end that indicates you guys Are, In Fact, Working With A Lawyer, and it’d be really helpful for us to, yknow… talk to that guy
- so we can get this movin
The rhetorical trick here is to paint the threat as reluctant — we really don’t want to do this, but you’re leaving us no choice. The damage becomes your fault for “forcing” their hand, even though the escalation was always part of the plan. It’s a professional version of “Don’t make me hurt you,” played out in legalese and email threads instead of raised voices.
Wheel spinning
I’ve pointed out the deadlock problem before, and as nicely as possible I point it out again here.
…
- miles
- are there problems with the lawyer on your end?
- GiovanH
- I’m happy to review a license, and I actually have some constructive ideas along those lines of my own, but as long as I’m still locked out we Can’t Do Anything.
- You’re saying you’re already working with C&Ds even though you know we can’t sign any license yet?
- I literally cannot even review one.
- I’m sure Bambosh has already explained this, but the way the project is structured, nothing can happen until we’re both involved in the decision-making process. Anything else is gridlocked.
- miles
- no, i’m saying that we’re DELAYING a C&D that we have no intention of following through with because again, We Want To Work With You Guys. andrews lawyer has it on the table because thats how lawyers operate8, but andrew is, again probably Literally as we speak, instructing the lawyer to back off on that
- as for your involvement, running the project as a twosome, we get it and as im just now getting back we can look into getting you under NDA so you can mutually look over the license
Just a few sentences later Miles jumps right back to “oh, no, you’re right, the next thing that has to happen is for us to offer you an NDA”, which exactly disproves his original threat. But those are the words he has to say, so he says them regardless.
My understanding is that Andrew’s lawyer is thought well of in his industry and has a reputation for being reasonable. He is not independently aggressive, he’s acting here on the direct instruction of his client.
At the same time the line is that Andrew is supposedly “delaying” legal action, but in reality it’s their decision to initiate it in the first place. It’s obviously deeply manipulative for Homestuck to talk about a C&D like this. It went seamlessly from an impossibility to something on the table. And even after loading the gun themselves and threatening to fire it they’re acting as if their lawyer is some wild beast Andrew is trying to reign in and not a professional they are actively paying to be their agent. Andrew is the one threatening to initiate legal hostilities against us if we don’t write him a blank check. Literally, he’s asking us to sign an agreement we can’t read.
There also is no “our” lawyer; Andrew has made it extremely clear I’m not to be involved in this stage, let alone legally. Again, legally Bambosh can’t tell me why talking with Andrew’s lawyer has made him suddenly have to get counsel to review documents they’re demanding he sign before we proceed, but what’s happening is that they’re pressuring him to sign some kind of hostile license. I’m only being included in the above thread so there’s an extra person to threaten; Miles knows perfectly well Homestuck tied my hands themselves.
This predictably spins in circles — without me ever being offered that NDA, of course — for a while until Andrew finally does send us a C&D, still keeping me out of the conversation.
James and Beyond Canon Teasers – Jan-Feb 2023
James Roach was ostensibly leading the HICU, and his name was on the paperwork, but we still hadn’t talked about the UHC project. But apparently he was still optimistic about the project, judging by him teasing it in some newsposts:
Beyond Canon Newspost, posted on 1 January 2024 by James …
Speaking of updates on things… some of you sleuths may have noticed some changes. I’d like to go into a little more detail about them to the extent that I am able. I also wanted to do this in an official newspost, and not on socials etc, so that there is no question about it.The contract with VIZ media has been restructured. What does this mean? Well, let’s start a little further back. We have gotten a lot of questions about Andrew’s involvement with HS:BC and Homestuck as a whole. I mentioned before that Andrew approached me to finish HS:BC. As many of you know a few years ago Andrew stepped back from having a creative role. This has allowed him to focus on oversight, and some behind-the-scenes stuff. A large part of that was regaining a sort of legal control of the brand as a whole.
So who “Owns Homestuck?” Well Andrew still does. Who has the publishing rights? We’re working on that! The HICU has a license to do what we want with the property, which is what has allowed us to do some of the more creative things we are trying to do. Is the Website going to be fixed? They’re working on that! I have very little to do with that, personally, but once there is something solid to announce there and the concerned parties are comfortable with it I’ll let you know. What does this mean for the commentaries? Behind the scenes, some ideas about how to handle the issues with the way Homestuck is going to be published are being discussed. Some of these ideas may include a new way to release the future book commentary in absence of the books themselves. Wow!
…
Hey, that’s us! Is the goal to use the Collection to fix up the Homestuck website? Who knows, maybe. James refers here to the Viz changes that allowed Andrew to involve themself in this project. And hey, there’s the commentary mentioned again.
Beyond Canon Newspost, posted on 2 February 2024 by James Hi, James Here. Another Month, Another Post. That is the way of the world sometimes. Not much to report this month, I don’t think? Andrew offered some new HICU licenses, but the one I was most excited to announce is still… being worked on? Some sort of legal situation being hammered out. Booooooooring. I used 8 o’s there for fun. I hope you liked it.
…
Always nice to be appreciated.
I hadn’t yet spoken to James about any of this before, which always struck me as odd. He was the one leading the HICU team, he was the one responsible for the project as a whole, his signature was on all the paperwork.
- James
- hows the stuff with the uhhh
- collection going?
- i was looking forward to tellin the community about that i think a lot of people will be real excited
- GiovanH
- I saw your newspost
- James
- i dont really like, ask about how things are going if they dont directly involve me LMAO
- GiovanH
- yeah
- I’m assuming you’re not familiar with the details then but right now from what I’ve been told things are locked up with lawyers for some reason
- James
- aint that just the way
- well, itll sort itself out
…
- GiovanH
- my understanding is there’s not much that can happen until I sign an NDA (which makes total sense) but they haven’t sent me one yet, so we’re stuck at the moment
James had some high-level knowledge that things were in talks but I don’t get the sense that he knew any the details or how things had turned sour. Of everyone involved, it seems like he should be the most motivated to make sure this was working well.
Andrew chases off Bambosh – May-June 2024
Eventually Andrew’s unfulfillable demands on Bambosh pass the breaking point as Andrew just directly starts threatening imminent legal action.
- miles
- hey guys, not super happy i have to reach out like this but its looking like this is where this needs to go. i wanna preface this by saying that im not really interested in opening up a discussion tonight, so id like you to read this message and just think on what it is we have to say before you guys respond. we can talk more in the coming days if you want, but everything that needs to be said vis-a-vis our point of view is going to be said now.
- andrew, HS legal counsel, and i all feel that your lawyer is essentially just stalling around and we’ve been making absolutely no meaningful progress, which honestly feels like a tactic you guys are playing at while you try to work something else out. communication is way, way too sparse to get anything productive done, we haven’t heard anything at all from your lawyer in three weeks (all while andrew’s lawyer has been pinging him weekly and getting ghosted more often than not throughout this entire process) and we’re getting fed up with it.
- at this point we’re interested in only 3 courses of action from you which are essentially non-negotiable and need to happen within about a week:
1: you get your lawyer to get back in touch with us seriously in a way that actually leads to anything getting done.
2: you sign the current version of the license as drawn up and presented by andrew’s lawyer.
3: if you don’t do either of the above, we start moving to issue a strike against the UHC, take it down, and replace it with a similar tool of our own design.- we’d rather things didn’t have to go the option 3 route at all, but we feel that you guys have made a process that should honestly have been fairly simple an extremely drawn out affair, eating up over half a year of time we could have been collaborating productively. all things considered, the offers we already made in terms of keeping you guys on the project, onboarding you to work with HS and the HICU, licensing you, and PAYING you have been extremely, extremely generous considering you’ve been publishing a giant hoard of almost the entirety of andrew’s body of work with no permission whatsoever, to say nothing of gio’s harmful behavior towards the hiveswap team that andrew was nonetheless fully willing to look past. we all sort of danced around this as you two were consistently trying to pull gio into talks before we were comfortable, but it’s something we all knew, and to be clear it is something we are going to expect gio to own up to and make amends on if we’re going to continue working together.
- honestly speaking, andrew’s lawyers actually advised us before we even reached out to you initially to not even bother with any of this, copyright strike it, and be done with it. instead, andrew wanted, and still wants, to reach out and do something with you guys.
- considering all of the above, however, and the way all our offers were essentially met with stalling and a lack of willingness to commit or to even have your lawyer communicate with ours in a timely manner, this is essentially the last chance we are willing to give you guys. in the event that you two decide not to play ball here, it’s looking highly likely that we’re just going to have to make moves to quickly copyright strike the UHC, remove it, and replace it with a tool of our own design. it’ll be inconvenient to have to do this, and the fans are going to be upset because the tool is great, but we can whip up a new one pretty easily if we need to.
- we would still rather just work with you and the tool that already exists. that said, we are at the point where we feel like you are either not taking this seriously, or angling to leverage this in a way that we find unacceptable. we have given you two ample time, opportunity, and consideration, and we feel like you’ve returned that courtesy with a lack of effort to our faces and what we are starting to assume, as mentioned previously, is some attempt to spin this in a way that is advantageous for you.
- i need to be clear here: there is no such spin. i mentioned before that if we have to take this down, we know that fans of homestuck and of your tool are going to be upset, but if that has to come to pass, we aren’t going to be shy about explaining to the fandom at large why it is we weren’t able to work together, and we are going to work as quickly as we can to provide them with a replacement ourselves. the long and short of it is that we reached out in good faith to you guys, offered you a license, and you sat on it for eight months.
- we aren’t interested in dragging out this preliminary phase any longer. read this again, think on it, and please do get back to us soon.
The accusations here are all nonsense, of course. It’s a description of what reality would have to be for them to be in the right, presented as if the fiction were a given. There is still no “our” lawyer; Bambosh’s personal legal representation explained to them he wasn’t able to unilaterally sign a document in secret and Andrew simply refused to hear it. I was certainly not privy of any discussion about any money flowing any direction except from us to Andrew. It’s not true that they ever offered “us” anything. And once again, Andrew is trying to “good cop, bad cop” themself by claiming they’re against all the legal proceedings they’ve started and that they aren’t making the threats they’re making. Saying at the end that they’re acting in “good faith” is demonstrably false.
They keep trying to complain about delays even though the project has been held up by them at every stage. We didn’t need an NDA to talk about the project! There was clearly no NDA required for The Unofficial Homestuck Collection to operate well and collaborate with other talent, as evidenced by the fact that we’d already been doing it successfully for years. Almost every delay has been (and will be) from something expensive they tried to impose.
Most importantly, the reason no progress has been made and license has been signed is neither Bambosh or I can unilaterally sign a license without the other, something we’ve repeatedly explained and Miles had acknowledged. Communication is sparse because they forced it to be! In the same breath he complains about insufficient communication Miles manages to also complain about our making them “uncomfortable” by trying to talk, presenting communicating as an offense. We have only ever tried to work toward cooperation while they tried to put leverage on us, and yet Homestuck tries to spin it as us leveraging them.
Importantly, we get legal action followed by replacing it “with a similar tool of our own design” presented, explicitly, as a threat. As presented, the primary purpose of a future “official collection” without our involvement would be a punishment to spite the UHC, not to serve as a real tool.
And on top of all that Homestuck is trying to redefine its relationship with me yet again. Now they were never willing to work together unless I made “amends” for some ambiguous harmful behavior no one has ever been able to explain.
I wouldn’t bother to let myself slow down to refute obvious falsehoods except that it’s important to show how Miles and Andrew slide seamlessly into threats and ultimatums. Nothing he’s saying is true and he’s just forcing his way through it. There is a complete disinterest in integrity; it’s dismissively thrown to the side in order to pursue threats and bully tactics.
The net result of all this was that Andrew Hussie’s behavior was so egregiously bad it chased Bambosh off his own project. Andrew isolated Bambosh and subjected him to intense bullying and pressure tactics, and it was disturbing to see even from the outside. So, for legal purposes, Bambosh disconnected himself from the UHC project on June 18, just before Andrew could Actually Sue Him. This left me fully responsible to handle things from there.
- Bambosh
- Okay, here’s my response:
- I developed this project out of a love for Homestuck. I put everything I had into it, to create the version of Homestuck I wanted to exist. This project was for me above anyone else, and the fact that it resonated with the larger community was always less important to me than the fact that I enjoyed developing it. Once I released the 1.1 version, I was pretty much spent - I’d put everything I had into the project, and wanted to move on. The only thing keeping me attached to the project so far has been Gio’s involvement. If he hadn’t stepped in, it would have been stagnant since 2020. He has contributed every single piece of code to the project since the V1.1 release, and written more code in total for the project than I did. Discarding all external context, I personally owe him a great deal for doing a massive amount of unpaid work for my project.9 This is why I’ve been hesitant to proceed without him. After everything he’s done for me, I believed it was the right thing to do to figure out what his place would be in the project before proceeding.
- You’ve claimed this to be a good faith outreach, and I was genuinely exited to join in.
- [Redacted: Conversation regarding particular interactions ]
- Every time I’ve tried to talk like a reasonable human being, you’ve shot it down. Every interaction we’ve had has been a thinly veiled threat legal threat towards me. I should think the fact that I’ve been spending my limited personal funds on a lawyer to engage with you on your terms would be enough to demonstrate that I really really wanted to make this work, but apparently not.
- I developed this project out of a love for Homestuck. And thanks to this entire negotiation, that love does not exist anymore. Frankly, every time I think about the shit you’ve tried to pull over me in this negotiation, I feel physically ill. I cannot imagine a world in which I sign this contract and can just resume business as usual. The moment has passed. You’ve beaten the motivation out of me.
- So, you’re getting what you want. I’m taking the project down, and abdicating all responsibility for it. I don’t want anything to do with it anymore. You guys can just make your own version. I wish you the best of luck. Don’t contact me again.
Gio Era – 2024-2025
So I became the primary maintainer of the project.
If I were reasonable I would have stopped there. Andrew and Miles had already been caught in enough lies that it was obvious that they weren’t willing to engage in good faith, especially with me. The Unofficial Homestuck Collection doesn’t support me financially in any way, so to keep trying to work with these people meant taking on legal and financial risk with no real possibility of reward. Best case scenario, I would continue to do valuable work for the Homestuck brand for free.
If they had been working with someone without my extraordinary patience, their behavior would have blown this up already. In fact, they were working with someone without my extraordinary patience previously, and they did in fact just blow that up, so it’s not a hypothetical. Andrew had burned through his best shot, but I could still manufacture one last chance for them to be reasonable, just once, for their own good.
But my heart was pure and my cause was righteous. So I gave it one more shot. I decide that I’m going to be as amenable as anyone possibly could be, and if they turned nasty again, it’d be them turning nasty again. And at the very least I’d get to see them do it. I decided to play it out. If they were going to attack us I wouldn’t be able to stop them, but I determined the project wouldn’t collapse because I didn’t want to do the legwork.
Making nice to me
What happens next is fascinating: they reset the board and try to run the cycle a second time.
- miles
- hey man, do you have some time to chat?
…
- GiovanH
- Obviously you know Bambosh dropped out, and I wasn’t privy to the details on exactly why that happened, but I’m still amenable to talk
- That’s just where I’m at right now
…
- miles
- so, to sum up whats happened, andrew decided today that he wanted bambosh to sign the license.
…
- miles
- and hes frustrated, and unfortunately the result of our conversation with bambosh tonight was that bambosh said he wants to wash his hands of all this and he torched the UHC off github, took it down, etc
- GiovanH
- So, to be clear, he dropped off the project and left the codebase to me. everything still exists but I’m leaving it down temporarily while we sort things out
- miles
- okay, thats excellent to hear.
…
- miles
- like again i want to be one hundred percent real with you here, it sucks that the UHC is down right now for the fans, but it also sucks to me on like… a personal level, insofar as i NEVER ever ever wanted bambosh or you to feel like we were trying to punish or be assholes about this.
- GiovanH
- I know the communication has been nightmarish
- miles
- the fact that this might have really hurt bambosh’s feelings sucks. i think hes a good guy and we value his love for homestuck.
…
- miles
- yeah..
- anyway
- like, last on this before we move on to a little business
- i just want him to know that, i guess.
- andrew has been frustrated, we’ve had to move in very official, stern, and sometimes cold ways, and i want him to understand that like… real people behind this do not want him to feel fucked up about this, and do not want him to feel like… forced out
For my part I explain the picking up of the pieces, which Homestuck didn’t seem to understand. Namely, we transferred mantainership or the project.
Also as soon as Bambosh was out of the picture, Miles immediately rubberbands back to fawning. We’re so sorry if he felt stressed, we didn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings, etc. He even goes so far as to say “we’ve had to be cold” here. Nobody “had” to be anything; Andrew left the project alone for years, then they decided they wanted it and started throwing punches. The obviously neutral stance would be to simply stop making demands, but Andrew always goes out of their way to pretend that isn’t a possibility. I know the concern for Bambosh isn’t true, I see the attempt at manipulation, it’s gross.
Putting out the fire
I start explaining my basic position, and Miles springs back to being the world’s kindest puppy salesman.
…
- GiovanH
- Also, while we’re being frank
- miles
- of course!
- GiovanH
- I think that, pragmatically, it’s not actually to my advantage to try to keep engaging constructively here, because I’m going in blind and there are already hurt feelings and takedown threats sitting around
- like, there are already takedown threats in the other thread, and I’m signing up to be the fall guy here
- miles
- so let’s talk about that a little
- GiovanH
- BUT I still see a win-win here that I’d actually really like to see happen
- so I’m choosing to take the riskier path here instead of just closing up shop
- miles
- i appreciate that
- so like
- lemme get into logistics a bit, but before i do that i do wanna emphasize one more time that like
- idk how else to say this so im just gonna speak as Me, and not as like a representative of anything,
- ████████
…
- miles
- so, to segue from personal to business.
- GiovanH
- I have some basic ideas for next steps but I’ll let you go first
- miles
- whats happening right now is that obv the UHC is down. im REALLY, really happy that bambosh didnt just torch everything, because its a fucking cool tool and we always wanted to work with it.
- GiovanH
- My current plan is for it to not go away if possible
- miles
- great. that’s ours as well
Great! They want the collection to keep existing for sure. This has been the most consistent part of their position all along. They love the thing! But things get real weird real quick, because Homestuck just can’t help itself.
…
- miles
- now, whats gonna happen is that as of right now, andrew IS invoking copyright strike to keep the UHC down, even though we didnt want it offline today if we could help it. what id like you to understand up front though is that andrew making that move legally and officially does NOT mean he wants it down forever, he and i are of one mind that we’d rather keep working with it
- so what’s going to happen now is that tomorrow, andrew’s lawyers are gonna get in touch with you. do you have legal representation yet?
- GiovanH
- So issuing a C&D before we even talk definitely seems like a step in the wrong direction
- And yes.
- miles
- great. lemme talk to andrew about the C&D because i kind of agree, but what he chooses to do with that is ultimately up to him and i have no say in his final call, nor what his legal team wants to do. BUT, i want to be one hundred percent clear here: what we want to do is start working out the process of getting the UHC back up, get you licensed, maybe bambosh as well if hes open to coming back, and get things moving again.
- GiovanH
- Like, making legal demands is a really hostile move, not something you do automatically just to do it
- I don’t know that I can just coexist with that
- miles
- so lemme talk to andrew tonight to see where he lands on that.
- but let me be clear on this because i keep getting distracted making other points.
- GiovanH
- I’m good to move forward cooperatively as long as nobody starts launching attacks, but if that happens that is a big deal
- miles
- so like, we’re still open to working with you specifically, this CD thing was in place before any of us were aware if youd want to work with us
- so we can come to a conclusion on that as soon as tonight
- but yeah, if bambosh is out, hes out. if he wants to come back wed be happy to have him because again, its important he know that we actually straight up do value him, but if he wants to wash his hands of this its regrettable but understandable.
…
- miles
- but already it looks like i think andrew is amenable to keeping a C+D/copyright strike off the record for now
- which is great. i agree that if we’re just gonna be working together theres really no need to go right to that
- if youd like i can ask him that in no uncertain terms RIGHT NOW?
…
- GiovanH
- Basically my offer is that I’m still willing to go forward in good faith so long as we’re all friendly and no one is making legal threats
- But, like, the threat of a lawsuit is a really big deal, and doesn’t just happen casually
- So let’s do whatever we can to avoid that
- Because if there is a real-deal cease and desist that I have to act on, I’ll have to act on it and cease and desist, and then I’ll have to explain what happened, and that’s the lose-lose-lose scenario
- miles
- so i do understand that andrew is gonna want to work legally with a capital L with you on some kinda framework going forward if for no other reason than to address the past bad blood, but i just talked to him about the C+D and he’s agreed there is no reason to do a copyright strike if you’re willing to move forward with us, sign an NDA, and work on getting licensed.
- to be clear, andrew is fine dropping the C+D for now
- GiovanH
- 👍
- miles
- which is good!
- obviously LOL
- again, we arent trying to do threats, as you said. its a dumb waste of everyones time. we just want to get set up in a way andrew is comfortable with, get you under license, and move this thing forward
If you’re thinking it’s bizarre for someone to say they’re glad they’re working with you but also want to immediately threaten a lawsuit, it’s because you’re right. This is the main recurring theme again: Andrew continually trying to get me legally on a leash while I force a smile and politely yet firmly refuse to collar myself.
The cease and desist here is the one they were about to attack Bambosh with. I almost didn’t catch it, but Miles drops that “this CD thing was in place before any of us were aware if youd want to work with us,” meaning that this whole friendly collab approach was a lie from the very beginning. I have to spell out that the collaborative partnership they insist they still want is incompatible with them exerting legal force. This is extremely basic, and I don’t really believe anyone involved didn’t understand that starting off with a C&D was an uncalled for form of legal violence.
My consistent position
OK, but what am I thinking here? Given how antagonistic and aggressive Andrew has already been, why am I playing this through instead of just letting Andrew very publicly dig his own grave, as they keep threatening to do? It’s still the same scorpion-and-the-frog dynamic, except we’re already down a frog and Homestuck’s stinger is already being brandished again. Homestuck isn’t going to be nice to Gio — is he stupid? Maybe.
If I act like a glutton for punishment that’s partially because my goal really was to work together and produce something cool and valuable, not to get some cheap-shot drama points. Even if Andrew had a tantrum they wanted to throw, maybe James would be there to put a hand on their shoulder. Heck, maybe once Andrew’s lawyer is in the room he’ll be the responsible one to temper Andrew with sound legal advice.
But I knew if they were going to blow it up, they were going to blow it up. I was not going to allow anyone any leeway to claim that somehow I was too demanding. I’m keeping everything scoped strictly to the collection project because that’s what was agreed on and that’s what allows us to work in the first place. Above all I’m going to be professional.
I still find myself trying to make excuses for Andrew. They’re Andrew! They are the god king of fiction. I know because they wrote themselves that way. Part of why I let this stretch on for as long as I did to my own detriment was to really definitively prove it to myself, that this wasn’t just in my head. I am a scientist and that means evidence before conclusion, and every blow I took was evidence.
If I were trying to farm offense I’d have had them dead to rights since the first takedown threat, but that’s never been me; I really did want to see them do this right if they possibly could. In stark contrast to Andrew I have no threats to make and no special pressure I can put on him. If I gave Homestuck every measure of grace anyone could give, would that be enough? Or was Homestuck fully radioactive?
Back to work – June-July 2024
So, with a pointless C&D off the table for now, we talked about how we could productively move things forward. Homestuck went back to lovey-dovey.
- GiovanH
- to talk shop for a sec, I see basically two separate projects here: licensing the collection so it’s not a risk is one, and then whatever further collaboration (i.e. official version or website work) is another
- miles
- and, preferably, get the UHC up ASAP
- we can talk the deets of that going forward!
…
- miles
- like.... after the NDA, getting the license up is literally first on our list. all other projects we do with ya would be happening under that framework
- ok yeah so as i was saying
- in summary!
- a: andrew and lawyers will reach out to you and lawyers soon, to get started on talking about the terms under which we’d like to work together
- b: once those terms are set, which we really hope doesnt take too long for the reasons we’ve laid out already, the UHC will get licensed and become the OHC or something like that, we can play around with it
- c: we settle a few new things as we figure out the Workflow Situation with the U/OHC and then begin new projects
- bc again, we fuck with the tool mega heavily and are excited for new stuff to happen
Vitally, despite the threat of having lawyers send me a cease-and-desist order mere minutes ago, Homestuck made it overwhelmingly clear that they wanted me to continue to keep the collection up for now. I did too, of course, but getting explicit permission from Homestuck means they can’t turn around and threaten me of copyright infringement, because I was acting how they asked me to. So this was a step in the right direction.
- GiovanH
- I’m still pondering whether the replacement is the best option but we’ll talk and do whatever makes sense. depends if he’s looking for something very different or basically the same
- but that’s deets
- miles
- for sure
- in the immediate, we’d actually want to keep the UHC up or get it back up ASAP, if possible, because none of us want to punish the fans for this
…
- miles
- NDA will be first step, then we can chat about getting you set up with the U/OHC to andrews satisfaction and talk about the details of that arrangement and then finally do some fucking cool shit
- GiovanH
- And I will see about spinning up a mirror
- miles
- alrighty, awesome
…
- GiovanH
- Ok everything should be totally continuous now, just with name changes
- I also want to avoid panic so long as nothing’s actually going wrong
- miles
- yeah definitely
- ok yeah getting it up again is fine for now, we’ll figure out its final zone later but itll be good to have it available for folks now
- so, right now id prefer if there was minimal to no public communication on this besides whats absolutely necessary
…
- GiovanH
- as far as I’m concerned all we’ve done is change the project maintainer
- miles
- wonderful
- GiovanH
- I 100% agree that having to announce at any point that we’re shutting down because we’ve had legal action taken against us is the Bad End and I’ll put in work to avoid that
- as previously discussed
- miles
- yep!
- glad we’re of one mind on this
Miles is overwhelmingly clear about Homestuck’s position here: they want the collection to stay up, they want me hosting the website and the asset pack, and my doing that constitutes actively working with them. We also have a schedule now, which is the same schedule from before:
- I sign an NDA
- I work with Andrew to agree on a license, which Miles also refers to as “terms”
- Happy collaboration forever
Different NDA signed June 27, 2024
The reason I’m able to bring details past this point to light is that the NDA they sent me next was not the HICU community release agreement that includes the overbroad NDA designed to stifle communication, but an entirely different standard mutual NDA suitable for protection of creative and technical data.
When they finally sent me an NDA I signed it quickly. It is properly scoped and covers a broad category of creative information I’m not allowed to discuss if Homestuck, Inc. shares it with me. I would not be able to leak you details I learned from the Beyond Canon writer’s room, for instance. But it does not generally silence me from talking about my experience, or prevent me from talking about information I had prior to the NDA.10 I was extremely careful about verifying this with my lawyer before signing, because I know about Andrew’s tendency to try to abuse NDAs.
I don’t know why they switched out the forms like this. Maybe it was to ensure I still couldn’t compare notes with Bambosh or other HICU members. Maybe it was to keep me at arms length from the rest of the HICU group. Maybe it was to further an ongoing campaign to try to estrange me from the larger fan community by preventing me from calling myself an HICU member. Maybe it was just to make sure nothing I signed committed them to treat me fairly. Whatever the reason, I was never going to agree to something that would tie my hands in the event of this kind of contingency that demands transparency into the proceedings, and I was careful to ensure I did not do so. So this, also, worked out.
As soon as he gets my signature Andrew refuses to call me by my chosen name and instead uses my full legal name wherever he possibly can. Notably, he does not do this for Bambosh or anyone else. Apparently he’d been using my legal name with other people before I told him, meaning he’d been digging up info on my identity himself. It’s a small, petty grossness, but he is just so pleased with himself that he has a socially-acceptable way to deny me one mote of dignity. It’s embarrassingly childish behavior. It’s truly incredible how this guy cares about bullying more than anything else.
NDA as Isolation
Andrew relies extremely heavily on social isolation tactics, especially coercing isolation by using threats of legal violence.
A common tool for this is NDA agreements, which are designed to be overbroad and punitive. They demand that association with Homestuck — including when they require you associate with them — be contingent on NDAs. These NDAs cover all conversations, which is used to cut off lines of communication victims can use to report abuse or even discuss issues with their peers.
Quoting directly from the HICU contract (again, not one I signed, but one some people have),
The purpose of this agreement is to secure confidentiality among an extended network of people… By joining this Group, you are committing to respecting the fact that statements of other Group members have been made only under the mutual understanding that all correspondence among members is private. Signing this form is a legally binding indication that you agree with these conditions of mutual respect and discretion.
… While protecting the financial interests of the Union is not the primary purpose of this agreement, and protecting the privacy and safety among Union and Group members is the primary purpose, nevertheless, if you violate the terms of this agreement, [Homestuck] will seek maximum financial damages, both to protect its financial interests, and more importantly, to vigilantly protect the privacy and safety of its members.
…
…you cannot terminate, cancel, or revoke this Agreement for any reason.
…
…You further agree to refrain from disclosing or using Confidential Information for any purpose other than participating in the Group. Your obligation to maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information shall survive termination in perpetuity.
…
All information is deemed Confidential Information.11 …
…
You agree that any violation or threatened violation of this Agreement will cause irreparable injury to the Union, entitling the Union to obtain injunctive relief in addition to all legal remedies.
I have confirmed with my legal counsel that this is not remotely standard language for an NDA. It is designed to intimidate and lock signatories into a coercive, punitive situation. Andrew relies on an ability to abuse NDAs, including by intentionally misrepresenting situations to people with the confidence that people who know the truth will be unable to correct him. I don’t say that as a hypothetical way someone could interpret this language, I’m reporting that as something I’ve personally seen Homestuck use that exact language to do.
What Andrew wants is the ability to get whatever they want whenever they want it, and this environment gets them that. The only source for remedy is to go through Andrew themself and have them find the grace to give you what you ask for. It is an abuser’s playground.
But even without the legal stranglehold of an NDA, Andrew uses traditional social isolation as a control tactic. Skipping ahead in the timeline, in January of this year I was scheduled to publish my first game on Steam — a collaboration with several other Homestuck fans. Less than a week away from the launch date, Homestuck intervened as personal retaliation against me. They reached out to other members of the team privately and threatened legal action against them if they continued associating themselves with me. This was paired — as far as I can tell — with some set of accusations about me they said NDA language prevented them from justifying. The play worked. Homestuck cut me off from people I considered good friends, and the whole project was a loss. I am still heartbroken and angry from this. Not because of the game, but because of the relationships I had with other people that they attacked.
But they do that. They were willing to do it with me, I’ve seen them do it to others, and it seems like they’re willing to do it regularly. Isolate an enemy and make them even more dependent on getting your personal favor, with social ostracization as a weapon to retaliate if they don’t.
Statement demand – August 2024
So now, starting in June 2024, I’m in a room with Miles and James, but no Andrew12 and no lawyers.
With the NDA signed we can finally get things moving again. I can have that “interview” with Andrew that was promised a year ago, we’ll put together a license that covers the kind of project Homestuck wants to work on and then it’s smooth sailing.
Dear reader, that is not what happened.
…
- miles
- so, the next stage of all this is basically that before moving onto getting the license squared away, andrew wants to work on what’s referred to here as a settlement.
…
…
- miles
- at any rate, in the meantime im just gonna summarize where we’re looking to go in terms of next steps
- to lay the groundwork for working with the UHC, andrew wants to reach a settlement that includes a retraction/rewrite
- the explicit details of this have yet to be hashed out and will probably be worked on in the coming weeks but its something andrew has made very clear he needs to see happen in some shape or form
- note that the rewrite/retraction itself doesnt have to happen RIGHT NOW or even necessarily before we get to work on UHC stuff, but agreeing to do it with the settlement is something andrew needs to see first
- miles
- but like. you GOTTA work with us, man
- the alternative is that if andrew feels much more stalled13 or like you arent operating with him in good faith, hes just going to switch gears, have the UHC taken down, replace it, and sue.15 the whole point of the settlement is so he doesnt have to do any of that shit14, because none of it is desirable and we dont wanna waste our time or energy on it when we could instead be making productive strides together
…
- miles
- what i need to establish now before this conversation goes any further is that i think i’ve been pretty light in my rhetoric for the most part, barring some cases when i needed to try and hustle bambosh and/or you along, but for today i have to be really, really clear: right now the only thing we’re interested in talking about is the settlement, and why it’s necessary, full-stop, before we consider doing literally anything else with you.
- im not gonna draw out a point i already made to you a few days ago, but just to recenter the conversation around this, we came to you guys 10 months ago open to collaboration (in the face of you guys publishing the UHC with no license) and we got put off and had all this drawn out for nearly a year so now more than ever, we feel like coming to an understanding about the settlement, what we want, and why its necessary to do before we get around to any work is like… mandatory.
…
Homestuck quickly moves from “we aren’t trying to do threats” to actually, they have demands and retaliation ready if their demands aren’t met.
This yields a series of demands from Andrew. The complaint in these demands has nothing to do with The Unofficial Homestuck Collection, but is instead rehashed Hiveswap whining. Before anything else can happen, I need to do whatever it takes to “repair my relationship”, and his first idea of how I can start to do this is releasing a public statement of confession. I as the wretched sinner must supplicate myself before Andrew the righteous god-king of Homestuck and confess my sins so I might be granted a tenuous stay into his glorious kingdom.
This is not the license discussion. In fact, this has been explicitly injected before the license discussion as a newly announced prerequisite.
Despite this being the stage for the scheduled interview, Andrew simply refuses to show up for this. Communication is still through copy-pasted text dumps and occasionally PDFs. It’s not a surprise but it is yet another breach of agreement.
…*
- miles
- what i want to get into today is more of the nitty gritty of why it is we feel this is necessary from a more human point of view. to be more direct, what i mean by this is today, and in subsequent discussions until you show us that you understand the necessity of this, i want to talk about why it is that we’ve gotten to the point where the options here are either settlement or lawsuit. there was a real human cost to the way things went down a couple years ago, to say nothing of the damage that was done to Homestuck and Hiveswap by the way that fiasco went down. you weren’t the only person involved in this, obviously, but regardless of your intentions (which to be clear andrew and much of the involved parties still feel were at least partially rooted in like… rabblerousing, to get old-timey about it), things went down really, really nastily for the Homestuck and Hiveswap teams. this is something we need you to understand and talk to us about.
…
- miles
- as detailed in the pdf i just sent you, and as i mentioned previously, real damage was done not only to Homestuck and Hiveswap as productions/brands/however you wanna look at it, but there was a huge storm of harassment and outright abuse of many staff members that was like… fucking unacceptable.22
- we’re not trying to hold you 100% accountable for all the bad shit that went down back then, but we’re also not about to pretend that your blog wasn’t a contributing factor of some significance that, among other things, “legitimized” sarah and emily’s video in the eyes of a bunch of rabid shitheads who weren’t interested so much in “accountability” or whatever the fuck reddit shit it was that they said as they were in dogpiling a group of creators just because they could. andrew also has made it clear to me, and wants me to communicate to you, that regardless of your intentions, he and other members of the team felt your behavior was stalkerish and unacceptable. there is history here that needs to be addressed.
- all this preamble is to say that really, before we do anything at all, we need to get real indication from you that this is something you understand, something you’re willing to show remorse for, and something you are willing to Concretely Commit to amending with us. if we’re going to collaborate at all, there has to be some kind of trust built here, and the only way that’s going to happen is for you to address this shit personally. we’re not interested in dancing around this any longer.
The fact that there even is a Homestuck Collection is all but forgotten. The only thing that matters is Andrew feels “owed” for the consequences of my old writing. This is about the fact that he considers me, personally, to be a problem. He has not bothered at any point to contact me about any of this. But now we’re in a room together, and he hopes that maybe if he corners me and threatens me with a big enough gun I’ll be able to un-hurt his feelings.
I was always concerned he would leverage copyright as an excuse for retaliation over my past writing. What I truly did not expect is that it would be completely blatant. We have spelled out in writing quid pro quo retaliation. Andrew doesn’t even mention copyright here, that’s clearly not what they care about. It’s just a weapon to be brought out later if I’m not subservient enough.
The consistent thing about this sophistry is they can’t point to anything objectionable I’ve ever done. The best excuse they can make is that other people were bad to them in a way they won’t explain either. The options are not “settlement or lawsuit” — there is no Hiveswap business that requires any settlement, and there’s no new offense that would create grounds to sue. They’re just loud and angry.
All of my pushing towards collaborating on the project he said he wanted to collaborate on has been ignored in favor of this show-of-dominance song and dance. Fundamentally, that matters more to Andrew than anything else, and it’s disgusting.
Details irrelevant
I hesitate to even go into the demands themselves, because they fundamentally don’t matter. It’s all nonsense implemented with the now-expected meandering threatening pages of Andrew sophistry and to give it a line-by-line inspection is to give it unearned dignity. The demands that I satisfy Andrew’s personal grievances is inappropriate in and of itself. It’s an attack, it’s breaking a truce, it’s a breach of agreement. It is, most importantly, an insistence on asserting dominance and creating a clear hierarchical relationship.
Earlier, I talked about what it looked like when I was trying to work constructively with someone I had a disagreement with. A big part of that is making sure not to predicate anything on “balancing the books”, since that’s a surefire way to turn this into foolish attempts to pin the other person to the ground. So no refusing to speak to each other until our anger is satisfied, no coming into the room angry at all. There’s no way to proceed down that road and everyone still emerge happy. I graciously agreed to set aside my disagreements and work with someone I had major outstanding criticisms of. We could work together for mutual benefit but that was it.
In contrast, what we have here is a demand that I prostrate myself before my master and beg his forgiveness before any kind of working relationship could be considered, as if he were a god too holy for a mere sinner to approach without first finding a way to satisfy their demand for punitive justice. Which, compared to my willingness to work together despite past conflict, is a really solid example of not doing that.
Good faith cannot coexist with this threatening and demanding behavior. If the first words out of my mouth were “sure, I’ll work for you… for $2,485,506” or “sure, but you have to release a statement apologizing for the MSPA Forums first” or even “sure, but first you have to publicly apologize for the death threats you’re indirectly responsible for”, that would put me in the wrong. That’d be me being aggressive and bringing non-UHC topics inappropriately into a scoped space. We were here to collaborate, not explicitly map out some sort of Petersonian dominance hierarchy.
Andrew already agreed to work with me, not some alternate version of me who thinks Andrew did nothing wrong he imagines could exist if he bends me hard enough.
So this is all a demand for dominance. Andrew is to be the alpha and my job is to be satisfying their desires. The goal here is to manufacture this false relationship. That and that alone marks this as another collapse of trust and pushes the relationship into aggression instead of cooperation. “Satisfy our grudge or we’ll sting you with our great big scorpion tail.”
Perhaps one day I’ll do a deep-dive into these documents because they’re truly absurd. For now though I’ll zoom in on just a couple of ideas.
Reversing Victim and Offender
First is a desperate, insistent reversal of victim and offender. Foundational to every point Andrew argues is the assumption that they are infallible, and all negative consequences in their life must be attributable to someone else doing them harm.
A common thread in the mess of sophistry is Andrew blaming me for their own “feelings of anger” towards me. I do not describe them as angry pejoratively either — this is the self description they gave to justify their own behavior. They assert that — for no reason they can describe — they had “every reason to believe [I] was acting in bad faith”, which they claim makes me directly responsible for his “feeling” that I was stalking them.
It isn’t true that they had any reason to target me, but more importantly they alway paints other people as being at fault for their own emotions and actions. They describe a straightforward situation of themself baselessly lashing out at people around them, but spends pages and pages of words insisting every problem they causes themself is always someone else’s fault.
Of course writing did not cause the project to fail. I wrote a description of how the project had already failed. This is not a tricky, subtle distinction, this is the kind of question psychologists test one and two year olds on to determine when the human mind learns how time works. It is not a real argument an adult can make to their adult audience. And it’s certainly not an argument they can make directly to me with a straight face on the hope that they’re intimidating enough that I don’t notice.
So much ink has been spilled over what a creative genius Andrew Hussie is, what a monumental contribution to culture Homestuck has been, the excellence of this one individual’s writing and humor. I’ve contributed extensively to it! It’s so bizarre, then, to see even the most basic and obvious criticism treated as an offense of impossible magnitude. It paints the picture of someone who doesn’t understand how their success was a confluence of many factors — talent, but also wealth, timing, and simple good fortune — and instead sees themselves of deserving absolute reverence regardless of facts. It’s someone who wrote themselves as a god for so long they think they’ve become one, and how dare anyone do anything short of worship them.
On Aysha’s Behalf
In a particularly disturbing example, Andrew explicitly brings up Aysha U. Farah’s brutal assault on me. This is one of the things I was intentionally not bringing up in order to be extra-generous to Hussie, but he actually describes this as a way in which I had harmed her by being a visible target for her to be “angry” towards. Andrew references the story of Aysha’s participation and orchestration in an entirely baseless harassment campaign against me.
- aysha
- go get this bitch https://twitter.com/giovan_h/status/1382045007008399367
- this fucking STALER
- STALKER
…
- aysha
- can you guys please go rip him apart
- i’m freaking out
2021-04-13T17:31:34.150ZI wish all giovan_h a very choke on a big fat dick and every YouTuber who uses stalker shit for views a very die
2021-06-30T19:34:39.363ZI really truly wish these youtubers dead
2021-07-01T17:54:07.948Zif your defense of doing some fucked shit is “I’m a journalist” you should know that all journalists will one day soon be lined up in a ditch and shot. your rich family will be laying flowers at a shallow grave you’re sharing with jake tapper and tucker carlson
This has done very real, very personal damage to me. I have real stalkers now, as a direct result of the slander spread by Andrew and Aysha. There is a very real discussion to have around children on the Internet stalking me and sending me death threats in the name of “Jubilism”, Andrew’s personal fictional religion whose practices include assassinating your online haters.16 I have had to explain to my mother that posting on Facebook about the nice lunch she had with me leads to my getting threatening messages about that lunch the next day. It’s brutal.
When this is described it’s not that angry people attacked a scapegoat or even as a colossal management failure, but that — in a sort of Trumpian word avalanche —:
It was this [stalking] pattern of behavior, along with his sourcing practices in particular, which escalated in fully justified feelings of anger toward [Legal Name], which finally reached a boiling point when his blog was massively elevated on Youtube, when thereafter the angry reaction of the Hiveswap team was used against them to cause even more harm in a very public way.
“The angry reaction of the Hiveswap team was used against them to cause even more harm in a very public way” is the kind of sentence I would write as a joke, except it’s the very real thesis of his argument. Andrew and his friends were angry and acted in that anger. They targeted me, started circulating lies, started openly coordinating a harassment campaign against me, because somebody didn’t like my tone. People saw this behavior and were horrified. It was vile and obviously so. And Andrew has the audacity to describe this as me “using their reaction against them.” If Aysha is indeed facing some pushback for the way she behaves, I can only be relieved. She was doing whatever it took to benefit herself even when it meant causing unnecessary harm to others; people like that shouldn’t be welcome in the creative industry. She was a danger to everyone around her, and I have to assume she still is.
To really cap off the absurdity, I find out it was probably Andrew himself who started claiming I was “stalking him”. I’ve always been confused how this claim started — did I really make someone uncomfortable? — but this ends my concerns. I’ve never written about Andrew’s personal life, even the public aspects of it that are widely known.17 But in this incident I’ve finally directly confirmed not only that Andrew is responsible for the rumor. For NDA reasons I can’t show you the exact reason he gave, but it had absolutely nothing to do with information about him, it was just an excuse to badmouth a “stuck cog.” There was never any misunderstanding, it’s always just been slander repeated by people who still view him as trustworthy.
He attempts the same DARVO attack on Sarah Z’s video, saying that “the ‘legal threat’ was then weaponized against the Hiveswap team even further, used as proof that What Pumpkin was a litigious, exploitative company which was trying to suppress criticism.”
Of course it was a very real legal threat — no scare quotes required — and Homestuck is indeed a litigious, exploitative company trying to suppress criticism. They look bad because they behaved terribly. It’s true that Sarah’s videos were devastating to Andrew’s personal reputation, but that’s because it was a straightforward account of terrible things Andrew did. It damaged his brand the way any scoundrel’s reputation is damaged when they’re caught.
But Andrew argues that all this must not be their fault, and is therefore Sarah’s. Listening to them, Andrew and his friends’ emotions are always justified. Their actions are always justified by their emotions, and the only fault that can ever be found is in people for their reactions to them. Any negative reactions, any negative consequences are always an attack against them.
“Blackmail”
Another thing I will pull out as important foreshadowing is this:
Bambosh18 had a chance to move this along very easily, but when he was pushed on it after his lawyer signaled final approval of the terms, he seems to have snapped and invoked the sudden takedown option as a kneejerk response, which essentially made good on the drama-blackmail implication which was the only real claim to any “leverage”19 a fan project like this actually has to hold over a creator and his teams. I’m not going to put too fine a point why that was a bad idea, because I assume [Legal Name] is in agreement.
I added a few footnote annotations to some of the absurdity in that, but what I really want to highlight here is this incredibly disingenuous argument about “blackmail” Andrew keeps going back to. Andrew repeatedly describes negative public perception as a result of him doing something objectionable in public as blackmail. In this case he argues that even though Andrew is making a threat to take down the collection, Bambosh taking down the collection in response to that demand would be Bambosh “blackmailing” Andrew, because having made a legal threat would make Andrew look bad.
This is, of course, fundamentally absurd. If you do something very objectionable in public and your audience abhors it, that’s not people attacking you. You do not have the right to be universally loved, and people making justified complaints isn’t the same as being attacked.
This is a mirroring of a favorite fallacy of Andrew’s I’ve already examined: that any negative consequence is evidence of malice and attack. In Homestuck’s case, the consequences they suffer stem from a combination of mismanagement and genuinely offensive behavior, a pattern which has not changed since before I started writing. The writing only captures what is already there. The problem is the act, not the window they did it in front of.
Andrew absolutely refuses to even consider the possibility they could be at fault, ever, for anything they do. Any and all negative consequences are always attacks someone else does to him, not just the human condition where if you do massively unpopular things in public people will dislike you.
Why should you face consequences for something just because you’ve said or done it?
Something, something, cancel culture.
Backlash to poor conduct is a natural and predictable consequence, but Andrew knows this because he’s a grown adult. So how do we end up with these insane claims?
I think the answer to this is clear in context. Andrew views the ability to demand a takedown not as an ability to demand a takedown, but as a general-purpose forcing device. The logical framing he starts with is “Do what I want or I’ll hurt you with ___“, and the tool he has to slot into that spot is legal force. In this case, a takedown demand.
But after it’s constructed this argument makes no sense. “Sign your project over to me or I’ll destroy it, but I also will not allow it to be destroyed” is an incoherent position, and so there’s this hastily-constructed “also, letting me destroy it is you blackmailing me” tacked onto the end. It’s so absurd it makes it easy to work backwards, like seeing a poor photoshop job where the outline is still visible. Andrew was just reaching for the nearest threat because his M.O. is to use threats to squeeze others. The fact that they’re trying to frame this as blackmail is just evidence of his shamelessness.
The goal is to exercise arbitrary power over people, to force them to do what he wants. He wants to always get whatever he wants with no friction. Actually executing on the threat is — ironically — a failure to exercise the power he wanted to. And because it’s an undesirable outcome, even though it’s one he’s directly causing, Andrew insists on finding a way to blame someone else.
Demand response
There’s so much anger here but nothing to do with anything I was responsible for, so I’m not eager to take responsibility for it. I’m not going to lie and post some statement lying about Sarah’s documentation of Homestuck threatening her just because Homestuck’s threatening me the same way. Integrity means standing by your work unless it’s wrong.
But even if this first set of demands had been somewhat reasonable, I’ve already seen that cowering in a subordinate role like Andrew wants would only lead to more demands, forever. Andrew uses people up.
I give Miles the same basic explanation I’ve given here. That’s not licensing or negotiating, that’s just dominance. This is not collaboration, this isn’t respectful, this is the scorpion stinging the frog. I make it clear I’m happy to negotiate and put together a license, but demands for specific performance like this that are not obviously reasonable will have to go through a lawyer.
This is responded to with an escalation of threats.
- GiovanH
- I already have many thoughts about this but I’ll need to tag up with [my legal representation] first.
…
- GiovanH
- but also, at a high level, off the record, deciding to make UHC work dependent on some kind of rehashing of four-year-old drama is one of the few choices with the potential to sabotage the project, so a step toward that is concerning
- miles
- thats also something we’re happy to talk about
- because ive had the same thought, we wanna do this in a way that doesnt just like
- dredge up old bullshit unproductively21
- so like i said, signing the settlement doesnt mean you necessarily have to do this rewrite before we get any UHC work done
- it just means youve agreed to do it at some point as we work out the details and timing
…
- miles
- i dont know how else to put it, signing a license with us doesnt legally complicate anything
- the situation you are in NOW, unsigned, and unafilliated with us, is legally complicated
- originally amending that was as simple as licensing up with us and getting to work on UHC stuff, which we still and always have wanted to do
- instead we are here, 10 months later, and only marginally closer to working together, and i dont know how else to put it, we feel fucked around here.
- the fact that lawyers are involved at all is kind of an unfortunate artifact of the fact that instead of just working with us when we came to you guys with open arms, you held us at arms length for months while sitting on a public repository of like, most of andrew’s life’s work as an artist, unlicensed
- and so the reason that we’re approaching you now with regards to a settlement is that, on top of the unfortunate business of all the hiveswap drama years ago that your writing did play a role in, when we came to you to try and just put that water under the bridge and work together, with some stipulations about your involvement that nonetheless were fully ready to make room for you, we were stalled
- frankly, to work with you, andrew at this point wants not only demonstrations of good faith which we feel like weve been dancing around at best and not getting at worst, but he wants that settlement signed so that he knows that you are actually serious about working with us, doing cool shit moving forward, and also trying to amend for some of the unfortunate bullshit that happened in the past
…
- miles
- the alternative is that if andrew feels much more stalled or like you arent operating with him in good faith, hes just going to switch gears, have the UHC taken down, replace it, and sue. the whole point of the settlement is so he doesnt have to do any of that shit, because none of it is desirable and we dont wanna waste our time or energy on it when we could instead be making productive strides together
- i dont know what more there is to say on our end right now. im a pretty nonconfrontational person so i dont like laying down ultimatums at all but you need to at least like get in the server and start talking to me and james or andrew feels like hes just going to have to take the UHC down.
There’s a lot wrong here, most of it covered already. We have another threat of a takedown, another threat of a lawsuit, another sugar-coating “but we don’t want do! just do what we say and no one has to get hurt”. Despite everything that’s happened I’m still trying to give them the chance to work together, a show of good faith that crosses the line into folly on my part.
Homestuck claiming that we weren’t “working with us when we came to you guys with open arms” and that “you held us at arms length” is truly outrageous. This is the exact opposite of what happened. Bambosh and I both responded to their invitations eagerly, but Andrew kept throwing up roadblocks and demands, very conspicuously keeping us at arm’s length.
The collection as “his work”
What I will pause here to address is this idea Miles gestures to, that the collection is “a public repository of like, most of andrew’s life’s work as an artist”. This comes up a few more times, always couched in vaguries:
- James
- anyway good luck gettin caught up looking forward to seeing you in there and getting this all squared away
- ive been using the UHC to stream its a good resource
…
- James
- so it makes sense to just like, build on something like this that exists already, didnt realize it was such a complicated thing
- just gotta get everyone on the same page
- GiovanH
- this kinda gets to what I was saying before
- IMO you’re right that it shouldn’t need to be a complicated thing
- James
- well idk i guess i get it
- andrew wanting to be protective of like, his entire lifes body of work and stuff
…
- miles
- and its frustrating for him because, and im not at all trying to diminish the value of the work you and bambosh do on the UHC because if it wasnt a cool tool we wouldnt even have come to you guys trying to work with you on it, its ultimately a tool that the Main Point Of And Entire Meat Of is like, all his comics and his art
- like the H in UHC stands for homestuck, which like… belongs to homestuck? and andrew? and so he feels spurned when instead of just taking it down he was like “hey come do some work for me because you guys clearly know what youre doing” and the answer was like… all this that’s happened since
- James
- yeah i guess this is like
- ultimately its andrews body of work being collected so he can probably do with it whatever he wants
Right off the bat it will always be disingenuous to treat the act of archival itself as an offense because Andrew’s stated goal is to do the same thing. Never mind that this is an archive of freely-available published works, Homestuck has repeatedly stated they like The Unofficial Homestuck Collection in its current form. They’ve endorsed it. There’s never been any objection to any of the material included, or the way it’s been presented, or any other criticism of the work we’ve been doing. The thing that’s happened here is an incredible amount of volunteer labor went into providing value for the Homestuck brand, for free. The work, they keep insisting, is good and what they want.
The idea here is that this incredible outpouring of volunteer labor is not something we’re providing, but something Andrew is entitled to. Andrew is demanding control over something they did not make and does not own on the basis that it’s about him. This argument implies that Andrew has the right to own any fanwork, and its creator doesn’t. That if you draw a Homestuck character, not only is he allowed to require you not to post the image, he’s entitled to sell prints and pocket the money. That Homestuck “is theirs”, in some sort of nebulous sense that far exceeds the work itself and extends to ownership of original fanwork.
Homestuck is theirs, and it was their job to get all this work done. That’s true in a sense of ownership-as-responsibility, that it’s an offense for companies to take authority but not responsibility for preservation. But it’s also true that he explicitly committed to deliver this exact product and completely failed to do so. They took money to get it done and then they didn’t. Then they made some sort of deal with Viz Media that was advertised as obligating them to do it but it apparently did not, because they didn’t do it.
Not only does the UHC address this negligence by making the work readable, my offer to work directly with Homestuck on licensing terms means by working with me they could even repurpose the UHC to fulfill their existing financial commitments.
The fact that Homestuck owns some material in the asset pack gives them the right to take down the asset pack, and that’s it. No matter how “theirs” it feels, the fact that the Homestuck collection collects Homestuck doesn’t give Homestuck any special right to compel any specific performance from anybody.
Andrew is on vacation and unavailable for most of this, busy flaunting his wealth on Instagram. He appears to just be on vacation for the rest of his life with a few brief exceptions. Throwing Makeship money into the slots while taking down the UHC, like Nero playing violin as Rome burns.
Resetting expectations
This is the point where I start just writing this article directly to them. Perhaps expectations were set wrong innocently and I needed to explain the baseline, because clearly they’d lost the page.
So, in no uncertain terms, I explicitly communicate that
- We both want something the other person can give us
- There are mutually beneficial collaborations that are free win-wins
- If they attack, that’s not a win for them, it’s a lose-lose
- I am not going to be subordinate to Andrew’s personal fantasies
…
- GiovanH
- for instance the last doc I saw tried to make everything depend on a lot of commitments about stuff unrelated to the UHC, and everything like that dramatically complicates things
- I keep saying there are some simple obvious wins we could be getting but that hasn’t happened yet
- anyway, more Monday
- James
- oh yeah i guess i usually just go along with stuff like that so everyone calms down and i can do w/e i need to actually be doin
- in my experience people just kinda wanna feel seen a lot of the time maybe
- you know?
- though idk easy way to get walked on i guess? (this is not that important to me, but i understand how it is for others)
- GiovanH
- so far it’s felt more like people wanting to put a gun to my head
- James
- eesh
- GiovanH
- which I realize is a very comfortable position for them to be in, but not good for collaboration
- James
- sorry man that sucks
- well i’ll see what i can do to cool some heads or w/e
…
- GiovanH
- yeah and hopefully the group helps with that
- like I’ve said from the start, I am happy to agree to disagree on old stuff and just work collaboratively on win-win stuff. But trying to turn this into some dominance game or use it to relitigate old drama is the main path to breaking all this, and I’m trying to keep us away from that if I can
- James
- yeah i think just gettin everyone together cooler heads will prevail etc
- GiovanH
- I just wanna do the win-wins, and I feel like there’s lots of them
- GiovanH
- So, there’s a lot going on here, but this is basically what I had gamed out as the failure scenario, so I’d much rather back up for a moment before talking about details.
- First, at a very high level, before I get into the body of this, I think trying to predicate UHC work on some “balancing of the books” is a very, very bad idea.
This is something I’ve signposted since the very beginning. Andrew and I have complaints with each other. But acting on those would be the exact opposite of what you want.- I was surprised you reached out offering to work with us given that feelings were probably still hurt, but you went out of your way to say, explicitly, that that wouldn’t be an issue. I decided early on that I wasn’t going to take this as an opportunity to be petty. We can agree to disagree and still work together productively.
- But what I’m seeing here is the opposite; it looks like there’s an enormous amount of resentment against me, and you’re specifically saying that if we don’t resolve that to your satisfaction, that’s a complete dealbreaker. In the conversation that brought me to this room in the first place, you promised the exact opposite; that we would be able to work on this specific project, perhaps begrudgingly, without fighting each other through every past fight and squabble we could scrape together.
- I also want to say that my objection here isn’t just about hiveswap, or aysha, or any individual bit of fandom drama. For four years now, I have invited you to contact me if you wanted to make any corrections or comments, and that offer still stands. I am happy to address inaccuracies in my writing, and I am happy to work to resolve interpersonal issues with members of the team as needed. I am on board to cooperate, and bend in places as needed
- But that’s not what this is asking for. What this writing is demanding is a great show of force, that you feel that before we can work together on anything you need to go through a ritual of performing dominance over an enemy.
And I am not going to humor that. I will absolutely work with you on resolving reasonable issues, but what I see here fundamentally isn’t about that. It is, very obviously, a dramatic show of force, and cannot possibly work as the basis for what you said you wanted to do here.- Making threats and demands about past grievances that are fundamentally unrelated to this project is the exact opposite of collaboration. They aren’t compatible with each other at all. Collaboration is cooperative, and what I see written here is intensely, intentionally hostile. And I don’t know why you would choose to go that lose-lose direction when there is an obvious win-win here. You shouldn’t scorpion-and-the-frog this.
- I really, really don’t want to fight this fight, and neither of you should either.
This is a conflict that can only end terribly, and it’s completely avoidable.- This conversation is our opportunity to all be adults in the room.
- JAMES
- sorry just checkin in now lemme catch up
- ok yeah im caught up
- well, i dont know that i’m interested in like bare knuckle brawling anything here either. and i think you being willing to work with us and work on corrections etc is a good starting point.
- GiovanH
- The worst case scenario for the project is if Andrew isn’t taking it seriously at all. If he doesn’t see this as an opportunity for a collaboration, or even for me to just give him a bunch of free stuff. He doesn’t care about the UHC at all, really. He instead thinks this is a big chance to get leverage over me for a series of past sleights. And it’s just not. But that’s what I’m seeing so far, and that’s disappointing.
…
- JAMES
- so, i think that, i don’t disagree about this not needing to be some display of dominance but i think, just as an outside observer here at least like some sort of understanding between parties would go a long way. theres a lot of legalese in these exchanges and i think that maybe thats amplifying things to feel very aggressive
- i dont wanna derail things, and i’ll let miles have a crack at it (im figuring out what to eat for dinner) but i also don’t want you to feel like you’re being bullied here by THE MAN or anything
- i think you have been misrepresented and scapegoated
- but i think there is still probably a level of responsibility and at least acknowledgement that will probably need to be involved. im glad you’re willing to work with us. and i know we’re willing to work with you. and i think the point of this channel of communication is to sort out how we can do that without getting weeks of lawyering involved
- GiovanH
- To reluctantly talk about the content of these PDFs (which I think are just prose andrew wrote? I am positive [Andrew’s lawyer] didn’t sign off on this), I think there’s just a ton of resent against me, and in the minds of a few people I’ve basically been scapegoated as being responsible for all evils. And I think it’s misplaced! Like, just factually, the idea that I was some hostile force was never right, and the conclusions predicated on that misunderstanding aren’t true either.
- I am 100% willing to talk about specific issues and work through real conflicts, but I am not going to sign up to be crucified for the sins of all redditors
…
- GiovanH
- I think this basically snowballed from some initial misperceptions, which was maybe encouraged by some preexisting anger toward me by some members on the team. Literally, predating hiveswap, just over vriscourse.
- JAMES
- whoa, had no clue
- i think i didnt know who you were until the document, though at first i mistook you for [REDACTED]
- who was the one who was getting very personal and stalky
…
- GiovanH
- a lot of the really nasty hate I get can be traced back to a few people who decided I was ontologically evil before I said anything about hiveswap, and to this day I don’t know exactly what I did that they fixated on me so hard
…
- GiovanH
- giving me pages and pages of text to nitpick is such good giobait, but I really think what I said there is the most important focus right now
- miles
- yeah, i think itll be good to also just sit down and like
- talk message to message for w hile
- *a while
- GiovanH
- and also, going off what james said, it sounds like there is probably some de-scapegoating work to do here, if you’re really working off the understanding that I need to be made to pay for all the sins in those lists
- because this whole base assumption that my whole game is destroying people on the internet to accumulate clout is fundamentally not true
…
- GiovanH
- like, reading that “human cost” doc23, it talks about “holding me accountable” for stuff that happened three or four degrees removed from me, which is why I say it’s hard to take seriously as any sort of good-faith conflict resolution
- miles
- sure
- so to address a question you asked earlier, these docs are essentially communications written by andrew that me (and also james on a pretty unofficial level, now) have been asked to communicate to you
- so lemme like
- attempt to synthesize a point here rq which you can respond to
- basically im not gonna insult your intelligence by being like “oh theres no hard feelings” because of course thats not true
- but a lot of the discussion about like…
- “accountability” as youve said
- it’s sort of been mixed in with what it is we want to put OUT, later, and in a way that may be kind of confusing, so to clarify
- sorry if my thoughts seem scattered btw im carbed out
- the settlement, license, etc, what we want you to sign, the good faith that goes into you signing that and agreeing to work with us is the vast majority of the “accountability” we’re hoping to see
- which has been spurred, in a way that i will be fair and cede is NOT fully your fault, by the pace at which things proceeded from last october
- i wont say that things havent got more tense than then but a lot of that is because its kind of baffling to us why we aren’t already like… 7 months deep into a collab?
…
- GiovanH
- Well, from where I’m standing, the question of whether Andrew wants to prioritize the a big dominance display above the UHC still remains. In fact, going from the last thing you said, the working answer to that is “yes”, which is why I’ve asked you to reconsider all that.
- I just am not going to sign a blank check.
- miles
- whats like… i mean maybe this is a pointless exercise but like whats the thing youre the most worried about happening vis a vis a “blank check”
- which btw is not like… what we’re asking
- but just hit me with the worst case scenario
- GiovanH
- I am not going to accept fault for things I wasn’t responsible for, I’m not going to agree to open-ended “until our satisfaction” language, and I’m not going to give someone else editorial control over an article published on my site in my name.
- But I think it’s a mistake to even be talking about this. I still think you ought to back way, way up, and decide if we’re going the in-good-faith collaboration path or the hostile threats-and-demands path. Because the more we talk about demands, the more we’re on the wrong track.
- You ought to be thinking in terms of specific things I can reasonably do as a show of good faith rather than trying to pack together the most aggressive demands you think you can get away with. And, again, what I’ve read so far has been the latter.
- If the answer is Andrew blows up the UHC over pettiness, that’s the answer. He shouldn’t pick that answer, but he can.
…
- GiovanH
- I also think Andrew may still be unfamiliar with the thing he’s asking about. I was under the impression that the report from the disgruntled person was the big offense, but that’s not “the hiveswap article”
- it is a disconnected side-article, and very intentionally so
- “the hiveswap article” is essentially a timeline of confirmable things that publically happened
- miles
- i mean, it’s “disconnected” but it’s not like it’s unrelated to the series of events that went down which by and large cause immense damage to homestuck’s reputation and the hiveswap team’s wellbeing (though again, part of this rewrite is giving you an opportunity to point out YOURSELF that this harm was far more on the shoulders of sarah and emily than any other Indivual People)
- GiovanH
- And we’re back to multiple degrees of separation. If WP did a thing and I said that it happened, and people didn’t like that WP did it, that’s not me wronging WP.
- “It lead to a PR problem” is not a fault on me, unless I am PR staff.
- miles
- andrew and you obviously have different ideas about your levels of like, Personal Culpability, but this is getting exacerbated by the fact that we were like “hey, come work with us on the UHC and get cool shit and get paid [which, to be clear, was a nice offer to people who were publishing the entirety of his life’s work for free with no license]” and we keep getting this stall treatment
- GiovanH
- Nobody ever talked to me about getting paid, and I never stalled anybody.
- The criticisms you are making are not applicable.
- miles
- andrew, the guy whose work you are publishing and whose reputation was (directly or indirectly) affected by your writing, feels that they are? and he’s looking for some kind of show of good faith from you that he’s just not getting
- he is, in my mind very fairly, cautious about this shit, because 4 years ago a bunch of people went apeshit and tried to burn his whole situation to the ground24
- GiovanH
- I am in this room, talking, trying very hard to make this work instead of doing the safe thing and walking away.
- miles
- i understand that that’s not nothing
- if this feels unproductive would you mind if we tried something else?
- GiovanH
- I feel like I’m just repeating myself now. I am entirely willing to participate in conflict resolution for specific offenses. I am not going to play dominance games or be made to account for a cloud of vagaries, none of which actually stick.
…
- GiovanH
- I mean, I am literally working very hard to give Andrew free stuff that makes his property more valuable. I choose to try to cooperate instead of trying to the situation as leverage for pettiness. I am paying for a lawyer. I do not have to do any of that, but I am doing it and so there is value you can take for free, if you don’t sting the frog.
…
- GiovanH
- We are still on the adversarial path, and we do not need to be.
- JAMES
- i think from andrews pov, he’s working with the information presented to him, so maybe with a little bit of conversation we can walk back some of it.
- GiovanH
- I definitely think some of this is stemming from bad info.
- miles
- it very well may be? that’s part of what you’d be helping to clarify
- JAMES
- i also think that, getting into the semantics of “apologize for these specific things” doesn’t really help anybody. i dont think anybody really wants that, even.
- kinda weird
- GiovanH
- And, like, I do still have things I think Andrew is at fault for doing, but I am choosing to put that aside here. Because we’re adults.
…
- JAMES
- if we’re gonna work together, and i’d still like that because i think its beneficial for all of us, i think we need to take some time to be on the same page here.
- so we have a base idea of what andrew wants, and i think this is probably more flexible than it sounds. or at least, can be worked with in a way that is good for both parties
- gio what would you like to come out of this
…
- GiovanH
- I am here to collaborate on a whole panel of possible ways the UHC work can be more useful. I think there are lots of fun ways that could go.
- I am also happy to license the collection in a form similar to how it is now so it can operate without tension. Again, multiple ways to approach that.
- There are still ways I feel I’ve been misrepresented and wronged by various homestuck people, including Andrew, but I would rather work constructively with people if I can than stir up old conflict. Agreeing to disagree, if needed.
- Like I said in my Big Message, I think cooperation can work as a win-win, and I think hostilities are a lose-lose, and I’m naive enough to still be aiming for the win-win. Which, if you haven’t gamed it out, is a big show of good faith
- JAMES
- yeah i think thats reasonable
…
- JAMES
- im not interested in villainizing you, and i dont think anybody really wants you to feel like you’re an enemy
- GiovanH
- let’s hope!
- JAMES
- well, i dont anyway. i think theres a little drama and theatrics here. a bit of flexing on both ends
- but who amongst us isnt guilty of that from time to time. lets tentatively put a pin in it for tonight because its getting late and im getting very sweaty (its very warm in my apartment) we’ll see what we can work up.
- miles
- yeah thats fine
- GiovanH
- sure thing
- miles
- ill pop in on the wrap up statements and clarify that i am with james that i think we all really do want this to work out
- JAMES
- if i have random thoughts in the middle of the night about it i’ll drop em in here
- yeah yeah
- GiovanH
- yeah feel free
- miles
- and like we mentioned i appreciate you are here talking to us about this, and i hope that despite things getting testy from time to time its apparent that we also want to work with you especially insofar as we’re talking this out at all
- GiovanH
- from what I’ve heard it sounds like the big block is that Andrew has, like, a really demonized image of me, and hopefully he can rethink that a little
The last conversation leaves off at “maybe Andrew is operating off misinformation, because all the things they said are wrong.” I think this is another case of normal inspection forcing Homestuck into the most reasonable justification possible for their previous behavior. But can it stick?
Seizure demand – September 2024
That was almost a productive conversation at the end there, right? What happens next is not “de-scapegoating” that we all concluded was reasonable. Instead, astonishingly, they begin the next conversation by using privileges they gave themselves in the Discord server they set up for these discussion to clean the productive parts of the slate.
- miles
- hey hey. you may notice we reset the general chat in here; we’re thinking of bringing in some more folks soon and we figure it isn’t productive to have the old discussion sitting there.
They privated the old general chat and made a new one. This is yet another exhausting power play, but when legal action is involved (like it is here) it also goes by the exciting name spoliation. (Also, I didn’t find this out until later, but apparently this is a practiced move they do regularly with people.) They never did return these records, but fortunately I’ve been keeping my own set too since I’m a responsible adult.
But perhaps despite this insane swing all the things they have to say now will be normal?
- miles
- vis a vis that, andrew and james and i sort of had a think about how things have been progressing, and we’ve decided to change course here. we’re gonna table the blog rewrite/settlement stuff and move on from it for now so we can get to UHC stuff instead of sitting around for months haggling over that; it’s not proceeding in any way that any of us find productive, least of all you, so we’re just gonna move past it until further notice.
- what we’re thinking is within the next week or two, we want to get kohi onboarded to this chat so we can get back into more solid and productive discussions of Things We Could Do With The UHC, getting it into the HICU/Homestuck network. i know you’ve got ideas, kohi has ideas, ideas abound; at some point maybe we can just strike the U and it’ll become the HC, but that’s more future talk and better suited to when kohi is in here talking shop.
So this starts well enough. Demanding I make some absurd statement is indeed not a productive path. It would be much better to talk shop. I’ve already been talking with Kohi about the collection.25 They’re great; I’d love to work with them, especially on UHC work. We have a solid gesture here in the direction of actually collaborating instead of letting Andrew posture.
But then Homestuck jams another stick into the spokes of the bike, because every decency they’ve given has just been an attempt to build credit to let them be awful later.
- miles
- to that point, however, there is something that was clarified in our last talks that has to be addressed before we move along with this any further. you mentioned, more than once, that you were aware that you had the potential to leverage our worst-case-scenario takedown of the UHC as a way to make us look bad in the eyes of the fans. that confirmed to us that you’ve considered the use of the UHC as a weapon against the Homestuck team if things don’t proceed in a direction that you’re satisfied with, which is obviously unacceptable to us. andrew has no interest in proceeding through talks while his own body of work is used against him as blackmail.
- as i mentioned earlier, we’re going to step back vis a vis the rewrite stuff. in exchange, and considering the above paragraph, we need to see the UHC handed over to kohi. what that does is neutralize the threat implied earlier, as well as put the UHC in the hands of not only a member of the HICU but someone you yourself have mentioned you want to work with and someone you respect where these types of projects are concerned. andrew doesn’t want to see his own work held hostage and used as leverage against him, and putting the UHC into kohi’s stewardship eliminates that possibility in one simple move.
- there’s still work we can do together, but for that to happen we have to be operating in a sphere where threats aren’t on the table, and that isn’t going to be possible until we know that the fans are going to have access to the UHC, and all of andrew’s work that’s on it, without the risk of its retraction being intentionally weaponized to cause drama that will hurt not only the fandom but the entire HS labor force.
They call it “The Art of the Deal.”
We’ve talked about the absurdity of this “blackmail” claim already; Andrew’s used the word several times to describe the scenario where they force me to take down the collection and I do so, and this is no exception. From my point of view it’s been intentionally hidden, but here’s the conversation they’re characterizing as a “blackmail threat”:
- miles
- [Andrew]’s looking for some kind of show of good faith from you that he’s just not getting
…
- GiovanH
- I mean, I am literally working very hard to give Andrew free stuff that makes his property more valuable. I choose to try to cooperate instead of trying to the situation as leverage for pettiness. I am paying for a lawyer. I do not have to do any of that, but I am doing it and so there is value you can take for free, if you don’t sting the frog.
…
- GiovanH
- I am here to collaborate on a whole panel of possible ways the UHC work can be more useful. I think there are lots of fun ways that could go.
- I am also happy to license the collection in a form similar to how it is now so it can operate without tension. Again, multiple ways to approach that.
…
- GiovanH
- like, if I were a provocatour, the quick win would be to let andrew C&D the collection, go “oh! oh! andrew broke your toy!” and get a bunch of clicks on my web site or whatever it is that clout is
- and this is me not doing that
…
- JAMES
- also yeah thats a good point, so thank you for that
- anyway, a little progress even if it doesn’t seem like it. we’ll work on things on our end to see if we cant soften expectation a little bit, i can say im glad you’re willing to work with us and are like amicable and even willing to play along a bit for the sake of moving forward. appreciate that.
They asked about good faith, and I gave an example. I am already stretching myself to work with Homestuck, and if I stopped trying to force a peace at any point it would be Andrew who suffers. This is me finally pointing out the elephant in the room, which is that the case where they attack me is the case where they lose, something Andrew seemed unwilling to acknowledge. The response was “that’s a good point, thank you.”
But we get the same inane blackmail logic as before. I’m working hard to protect Andrew from themself, and eventually I might have to stop. This is not a trap I’ve imposed on Andrew, this is me as Atlas holding up the world while they keep knocking all the supports away. The fact that I might stop doing that is inconvenient, so it has to be turned into something offensive I’m doing to them.
And this supposed offense is the justification they give for a whole new absurd demand: that I simply “hand over” the project to them. It’s the full smartgeniusnewadmin. Kohi’s great. I’d trust Kohi with this entirely, except I’ve been shown very clearly that I can’t trust his boss.
This is the culmination of all the absurd power plays: just demanding, outright, that I give them everything for free. I was braced for him to try to slowly push me out in a plausibly deniable way. But no, the power-play is so important to him he keeps firing smoking guns. Andrew Hussie is not going to make me sign control of a fan project over to somebody they like more because they do not get to do that. No one in his position can ever be allowed to do anything like that.
This isn’t just a demand, it’s a pushy demand. They’re trying to get me caught up in the flow. The channel’s made, we’re about to invite Kohi in, everything’s all ready to go except you’ve got to real quick forfeit your work to people who have proven they can’t be trusted. Don’t think about it, let’s get moving, chop-chop.
Seizure-response wheel-spinning
I am exhausted from trying to coax Homestuck into acting like an adult, and I just spell the problem out directly.
- GiovanH
- Don’t be absurd.
- Again, let me try to skip over correcting factual inaccuracies and try to address the problem at the core of this:
- You know perfectly well that I haven’t said anything even remotely approaching leveraging anything as “blackmail”, even though you’ve just tried to delete the evidence of that. I pointed out that if I stopped actively trying to push this towards a common goal, your stated intent to send me a cease and desist order would be an unprovoked attack that people would react negatively to. That’s not me doing a blackmail to artificially make you look bad, that’s me trying very hard to keep you from very publicly shooting yourselves in the foot, which you seem intent on doing.
That you would try to spin this as me being a threatening presence is shameful, and embarrassing.
James may not be aware of this, but you’ve brought up this notion that a public outcry against you acting aggressively towards me would somehow be considered my fault, and it’s as wrong now as it was then.- As much as I like Kohi and would love to work with him on the project, I am not going to voluntarily hand over any legal rights at the end of the barrel of a gun. Or in some way that you perceive as me being at the barrel of a gun, even if that’s not reflective of any reality of the situation.
- I will say again, as I’ve said repeatedly before, that this collaboration fundamentally does not work if you insist on viewing my having agency in this collaboration as a “threat” that you must necessarily nullify. Frankly, I’m astonished you don’t see that. In fact, you said you did; As is now typical of this project, the demands you’re making now are for things that, in just our last conversation, we all agreed would be unreasonable to ask for, and removed from the table.
- There is not going to be a dominance ritual. There is not going to be a point in this process where I sacrifice all my reputation, rights, and agency over to someone else so they can pretend they’re the god-king. This is an opportunity for a collaboration between creators. It is not, and has never been, an opportunity for anyone to make unilateral demands of anyone else.
- Moreover I’m really disappointed to see your doubling-down in all of the points I had described as representing bad-faith action, even to the point of trying to erase what productive conversation we did have. I don’t know how transparent you’ve been with others about this, but Miles should know full well that he’s been acting in violation of specific commitments he’s made. You are not in any position to act like I’m the one putting strain on this. I’ve been very diligent about that.
- As I’ve made extremely clear, I’ve been trying to get us off the track of absurd hostilities and back toward working cooperatively, which has included trying to brush over the flagrant bad faith you’ve been displaying so far. You’ve already burnt through a fuse by chasing Bambosh off the project, and you’re obviously doing your best to burn through all the goodwill I’ve managed to produce for this project too. I am flabbergasted that you’ve chosen to proceed in this fashion.
…
- miles
- i get that things keep feeling unproductive and like the wheels are just spinning for no reason but like… the reason thats happening isnt because the goal of all this has been to punish you or some shit, because thats dumb and pointless and serves literally nobody? but what gets andrew feeling defensive, or feeling like… frustrated and warded away, i guess? is that this went from a thing we thought was gonna take like, 3 weeks, for you and bambosh to just sign up and get under license and work with homestuck, to this continually drawn out process where we keep coming to you guys with this request to come under homestucks network and work with us, and the answer kept being No. No. No. No.
- and its frustrating for him because, and im not at all trying to diminish the value of the work you and bambosh do on the UHC because if it wasnt a cool tool we wouldnt even have come to you guys trying to work with you on it, its ultimately a tool that the Main Point Of And Entire Meat Of is like, all his comics and his art
- like the H in UHC stands for homestuck, which like… belongs to homestuck? and andrew? and so he feels spurned when instead of just taking it down he was like “hey come do some work for me because you guys clearly know what youre doing” and the answer was like… all this that’s happened since
…
- GiovanH
- I don’t really have any new information
- I can’t speak to Bambosh, but my answer to collaboration stuff has always been “yes”. What’s caused “no”s hasn’t been the work itself, it’s been the addition of additional demands and threats.
- “All this that’s happened since” hasn’t been me trying to be difficult, it’s been complications arising due to setting out one thing as a plan and then doing something very different.
- The collaboration part is easy. The extreme defensiveness, demands, and general squeezing is what’s introduced complications.
- The now-removed chat starts with me saying “hey, let’s do work” and you saying “ok, first off, we aren’t doing squat until you confess to a new list of accusations”
i get that things keep feeling unproductive and like the wheels are just spinning for no reason but like… the […]
- All that to say, this framing is simply not true.
- Neither is the framing of me as threatening “blackmail”, nor the framing of me as a threat that needs to be diffused. You’re not being honest about this anymore.
…
- miles
- nobody wants to like… make another bambosh situation happen
- speaking of which, is bambosh doing alright?
- i mean you dont really have to answer that if it feels private, idk
- GiovanH
- And yet they’re willing to offend without limit.
- I mean, I don’t think he’s any fan of Andew yet.
- miles
- all i can really say to that is what ive said before which is that it isnt anyones intention to try and offend or attack anyone, i just asked because i know he got frayed pretty bad towards the end and whether you believe it or not im sorry that he got that stressed by all of it
- but like i said i dont wanna get too deep into anything else so ill just leave you with like that, but as always if something else comes up feel free to hit me up
- GiovanH
- If Andrew was doing this same knives-out aggression with him, I think it’s a wonder he held on as long as he did.
…
- James
- yeesh this is a lot for a saturday evening
- hm.
- GiovanH
- this is what it’s been like all year, on my end
- James
- well this is the opposite of dialing it back
…
- James
- i feel like this could have been so easy and its actually very frustrating and disappointing that it hasnt been.
- GiovanH
- That is exactly where I am.
- This should be such an easy win.
…
- James
- i appreciate that
- for what its worth i really appreciate your patience and like
- dignity here. i’ll see what i can do. i guess thats my job.
- GiovanH
- Like I said in the thing, you would not believe how many promises have been broken already.
- James
- sorry man
- GiovanH
- It is what it is.
- I am guessing what happened previously is that Bambosh did not have quite as much patience for a torrent of aggression than I do. But that is what it’s been.
…
- GiovanH
- Well, since it looks like you’ve gotten stuck with the job of consensus-building, you certainly have my sympathies for that.
- I will continue to support any not-trainwreck options as long as they don’t involve my de-personing.
- James
- appreciate it
HICU fork – Nov 2, 2024
The next attempt to just shut me down comes in the form of the HICU “Unofficial Homestuck Collection” fork. Unceremoniously, the official Homestuck github account forks the UHC project and puts up a sparce landing page that is essentially false.
About the Unofficial Homestuck Collection
Originally developed by Bambosh and Giovan_h, The Unofficial Homestuck Collection is a fan-created browser for reading Homestuck and other works by Andrew Hussie as they were originally intended to be experienced with native Flash support. The browser does not fetch content from the internet and instead utilizes an Asset Pack that must be downloaded by the user alongside the software for it to serve content. The UHC includes a “New Reader Mode” to present Homestuck as it was originally released, an inline media player for streaming music from the Homestuck Bandcamp, and many more features to enhance the user’s reading experience.
A new “Official” Homestuck Collection is now in development, and the original Unofficial Homestuck Collection will continue to be preserved and available here. It should be noted that while it remains open source, any official updates or changes will be made on a new Homestuck Independant[sic] Creative Union controlled GitHub fork that can be found here.
The HICU describes the UHC as being “originally” developed by us — stylizing my name incorrectly in the process — but explaining that it has been replaced by this new version, “controlled” by the Homestuck Independent Creative Union. This is done by the Homestuck Independent Creative Union under the official “Homestuck” GitHub account, because they’re functionally interchangable.
Even publicly, the fork is narratively framing itself as a “successor” to the original UHC, supplanting the original. And it only differentiates itself by having different management. The implication is they have some sort of consent or authority to make this decision, but they do not. The whole move is another example of Andrew trying to impose their will through force and pressure instead of treating the people around him with respect or allowing any sort of process that in any way empowers others.
The HICU and Homestuck Inc both claim ownership over the fork. What’s going on here? It’s actually very simple: there is no underlying separation between the two. A lot of work has gone into describing the HICU as separate from existing baggage but that simply isn’t how the organization is structured or how it acts. There is nothing independent about it and it’s certainly nothing like any union.
They wanted to control the UHC, or else replace it with something they controlled. So far they’d entirely failed on both fronts, so instead of working with the people they’d need to work with, they just made a new website declaring it true.
They’re also distributing the Asset Pack V2 package Bambosh and I constructed. This is an incredible move because not only are they distributing the only thing the UHC doesn’t have the right to distribute, they don’t have the right to distribute it either. Some of the copyrighted materials it contains are things they have the right to share, but the asset pack also has many resources they absolutely cannot freely distribute themselves, including Adobe’s flash binaries.
Like I’ve mentioned Kohi had previously chatted about Unofficial Homestuck Collection development work on the practical side. I am confident any involvement he had in the OHC fork was done in good faith without an understanding of how it fit in the larger puzzle.
At the time I made no complaint about this or demand that they cease. From a copyright perspective, this is actually fine. They are licensing the reader application from me, but so far they’re doing it more-or-less under the terms of the license. So long as they respect the project license, them distributing the asset pack like this would actually allow me to focus entirely on the reader application without needing any license from Homestuck.
DMCA Nov/Dec 2024
The next thing they do is once again refuse to respond with any of the ideas I’ve presented, but instead escalate even further in the form of a DMCA takedown.
- homestuckicu
- Please read the attached DMCA notice. This was just delivered to your counsel by Andrew’s counsel.
…
- homestuckicu
- The future of the UHC will be made apparent once we see compliance with the DMCA. The intention here is not to kill the project. But it’s essential that you show a willingness to cooperate with the notice from Andrew’s counsel before the next steps are taken.
- All of our correspondence has been turned over to Andrew and his counsel, including the conversations in this server, and all relevant DMs. We were asked to do this by Andrew and his counsel so that they had thorough background context to consider their approach. All conversations will remain confidential.
- Andrew and his counsel have been extremely critical of many statements you’ve made, and the way you’ve handled yourself in general during this process. He’s asked that none of his remarks be quoted or summarized here. His view may be communicated through legal channels in the future, but starting now, the HICU will be fully disengaged from that process.
…
- homestuckicu
- We wish you all the best with your future endeavors, where they do not conflict with the interests of Homestuck, its creator, and its labor force.
- Kind regards,
- The Homestuck Independent Creative Union
This is the first message ever sent from the “homestuckicu” discord account, the account used to hide records earlier. God only knows who actually wrote this.
Note how the operating party here is the HICU even though the rightsholder is Homestuck, Inc. and the executor is Andrew. The labels aren’t placed carefully because they’re all functionally interchangeable.
The actual DMCA sent from Andrew’s legal representation is standard and concise:
[Andrew’s Lawyer], Nov 22, 2024 …
As you are aware, our office represents Homestuck Inc. (“Homestuck”). This letter serves as an official notification of copyright infringement by your client, [Legal Name] (your “Client”) pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 512) for infringing materials located on your Client’s website, https://homestuck.giovanh.com/unofficial-homestuck-collection/. We respectfully request that you forward this correspondence to your Client, or in the alternative, notify us that you do not represent your Client with regard to this matter.Homestuck is the rights holder of the registered and copyrighted material that has been improperly displayed on and otherwise incorporated into your Client’s website, which consists of the copyrights of the webcomic “Homestuck,” the originals of which can be found at https://www.homestuck.com/. The infringing works are a direct copy of our client’s original copyrighted work or is substantially similar to our client’s work.
We have a good faith belief that Homestuck’s rights are being infringed and these materials are posted without proper authorization from Homestuck, any of its agents, or the law. The information in this notification is correct and we swear under the penalty of perjury that we are authorized to act on behalf of the owner of these exclusive rights. This includes, specifically, the copyrights that we allege to be infringed upon.
Upon receipt of this notification, your Client now has actual notice that the material on your Client’s system is infringing and, in order to avoid liability, it is incumbent upon your Client pursuant to 17 U.S.C § 512 to remove and/or disable the infringing materials immediately.
…
This is the anticipated request for us to stop hosting and linking to the Asset Pack, which does indeed contain a direct copy of some of Homestuck’s copyrighted work. Up until now I was only hosting it on the direct request of Homestuck itself, but they have the right to require its removal and so we remove it. This includes all links to the asset pack and the material it contains, but also required the removal of the live UHC webapp.
The only thing that was left was the project description page at https://homestuck.giovanh.com with the asset pack removed:
Importantly, this pairs with the HICU fork as an attempt at a particularly nasty Indiana Jones switcheroo. If I have to take my reader application down at the same time as they’ve created a copy, it looks like the project really did “move” to them, which is not at all what’s happened.
…
- GiovanH
- In general I’m just trying to get the legal demands properly addressed right now through the lawyers too
…
- GiovanH
- So I was kind of thrown for a loop by the announcement and various legal runarounds I’ve been seeing
- if andrew wants to shut down the discord conversation and have the lawyers slowly put something together, I guess that’s okay, but that only works if you’re not also releasing big confident public announcements about what he’s guessing the results of that process will be
- James
- well from what i understand it represents a large bit of work you’ve done, so i can understand the apprehension in taking it down entirely. is there a specific issue with like a redirect etc (forgive me if im a bit slow on the uptake)
- GiovanH
- So, high level, from my perspective, what I’m seeing now is the “hostile takeover” scenario, where seemingly the main goal is to cut me out of my work and let andrew effectively take ownership of it
- and if the way they’re trying to do that now is copy the whole project without me involved and then obliterate the original project, so from the outside it’s a sleight-of-hand where it looks like the same project but I’ve mysteriously left, I have some objections to that
- and if whatever happens happens through overtly hostile legal action (as it’s leaning towards now) instead of any kind of working relationship, I’m probably going to be sour on the new thing
- It’s not at all lost on me that I’ve been persistently trying to talk about collaborating on a project (which was the original pitch) and sorting out a licensing arrangement, and instead all Andrew has been interested in doing is talking about rewriting old hiveswap posts, and me writing the HICU blank checks, and then getting progressively more hostile when I say I’d rather do the HICU stuff they invited me to do instead.
- It really seems like there’s a personal vendetta against me first and foremost, and the UHC is almost an afterthought to that.
- I had a whole plan where I would pay homestuck/hicu/whoever a license fee just to continue providing the collection in its current form
- and another where you and kohi and I would convert the project to something that looks more like the official collection they’re wanting now
- and another where in addition to the UHC I help the HICU create their own downstream OHC fork
- and I was never even given the chance to talk about any of that, because it’s just been 100% guns-to-heads, the whole time
- James
- yeah, seems like the whole things gone a bit south, despite any effort i had to keep it regular. is there any kinda statement you’d be fine with, i guess? since its already at this point
- i think theres been a lot of “waiting to see how it goes” and then, this is how it went because of that.
…
- GiovanH
- notes in the official announcement that stood out to be as big red flags were how it was framed as a “moving” (again, that’s a sleight of hand, what they’re currently doing is this legally aggressive replacement thing), and also how they’re in “licensing talks”, when what actually happened is I tried to offer them a license and they threatened to sue me instead, then cut off the talks
- James
- dang, guess thats fair. sorry just as an aside how on earth does everyone just have a lawyer thats crazy
- […] this lawyer shit is bonkers to me
- GiovanH
- i mean, just looking at the message from miles
Andrew’s intentions now are to have both of your counsels work together until the legal issues surrounding this matter are put to rest. This will take time, and any provocative gestures you make publicly will complicate that process and possibly put you in more significant legal jeopardy than you’d prefer. It will also incite drama within the fandom, which innocent members of the Homestuck creative teams will have to contend with.
- again, this is fine, but this cuts both ways; when andrew makes provocative public gestures before stuff is resolved, that complicates the legal process and incites drama too
i can barely even afford rent this lawyer shit is bonkers to me
- between you and me it’s been a huge burden that’s just made this whole process vastly more stressful
- James
- ok so basically just a timing thing, that make sense
- i can see what i can do to like, at least let them wait til the dusts settled before making some sort of public thing.
- which i guess will result in some sort of downtime, which sucks, but also probably the only real way to let it get sorted out
- GiovanH
- I mean, the discord conversation was the way to avoid that, but he’s cut that off
- James
- yeah
- i mean im not like ignorant i know im the “smooth it over” guy a lot of the time, but thanks for talkin to me about it either way
- GiovanH
- if the thing andrew fundamentally wants to do is bully, there’s only so much comms can do about that
…
- GiovanH
- I know I keep saying I’m not interested in drama but literally the prospect of this ending in some legally hostile or forceful way and me having to untangle these events and put out some kind of post explaining what happened has me so stressed out I think it’s affecting me medically
…
- GiovanH
- this is why stuff like “Andrew and his counsel have been extremely critical of many statements you’ve made, and the way you’ve handled yourself in general during this process.” gets to me, because I have really been trying, here
Dec 2024 Escalation
Despite my removal of the copyrighted assets they required us to remove, Homestuck sends another DMCA request as if their first one was never honored.
[The Unofficial Homestuck Collection’s Lawyer], Dec 11, 2024 …
Thank you for your patience. My understanding is that my client had removed the bulk of the IP belonging to your clients, but not the app itself, which contains de minimus references to/examples of their content. If the former has been put back up, it may be in error and I will inquire. Here is how my client breaks down the different things he has related to this matter:
- The Asset Pack
- Links to this were present at the now-disabled https://homestuck.giovanh.com/unofficial-homestuck-collection/ address
- The reader application, which is the open-source codebase. It contains minimal-to-no copyrighted material.
- Links to this were present at the now-disabled https://homestuck.giovanh.com/unofficial-homestuck-collection/ address, and it also has code and releases on github.
- The Web Application, which is a modified version of the reader that works in a browser. It contains minimal-to-no copyrighted material. It mostly fetches resources from elsewhere on the internet. If they objected to this, I would need a clear explanation of what about it was objectionable, so it could be reworked not to trigger those complaints.
- This was hosted at the root https://homestuck.giovanh.com/ address, not the unofficial-homestuck-collection subpage. This is also currently disabled.
Can you please advise on what is currently available that your clients object to and where it is located?
Homestuck ultimately argues that the infringing material is the two screenshots of the UHC, which include fragments of two Homestuck panels:
[Andrew’s Lawyer], Dec 20, 2024 Regarding your client’s copyright infringement, I am happy to clarify in the interest of furthering this matter to swift resolution. Attached you’ll find a .pdf of the page as of this email. In that, I’ve outlined in bold red boxes and circles the most obvious examples of your client’s website displaying my client’s copyrighted work. Most notably, the files marked as collection.gif and bandcamp.gif are portions of my client’s copyrighted works, and subject to the previously transmitted takedown. …
I also must inform you that your client has engaged in ongoing and continuous trademark infringement, which must immediately cease and desist. Our client is the owner of the trademark HOMESTUCK (Reg # 4691366) …
It is incumbent upon your client to immediately remove their website entitled The Unofficial Homestuck Collection, including their use of the URL for the same (https://homestuck.giovanh.com/unofficial-homestuck-collection/), as the same is a clear and obvious violation of our client’s trademark rights.
Our client is willing to come to an amicable resolution, but shall do so only under terms acceptable to them. To date, your client’s actions have not reflected their respect for the intellectual property rights of my client, which is unacceptable. Our client is willing and prepared to take all actions necessary to defend and enforce their intellectual property.
I appreciate your ongoing attention to this matter and reiterate that our hope is to bring this matter to an amicable resolution, however, our client is unable to ignore flagrant, ongoing, and widespread abuses and infringement of its rights to both its creative work and business interests. The same must immediately cease.
I was also later able to confirm with the group chat that, yes, Andrew’s assertion was that they had the right to take down the website describing the collection even when there was no distribution of Homestuck taking place.
Meanwhile the Hiveswap Andrew name cares about so much is being displaced by a crypto token, but all Andrew’s legal resources are going into bullying people who use the word “Homestuck” to describe the comic of the same name.
As always I was being as generous as possible with their demands, which meant taking the entire site down until the lawyers could get this straightened out.
- GiovanH
- Before I ask specific questions, does anyone want to give me a status update? Vibe check?
- miles
- so as things stand currently, there isn’t really anything more for james and i to say to you on andrew’s behalf (or ours) that hasn’t already been said, except that while we’re here i’m gonna check in on the status of the DMCA that was sent to your lawyer almost 3 weeks ago on december 11th. for the record, that DMCA required that you take down the infringing content (namely the UHC site, which you put back up in violation of a previous DMCA sent earlier in december that you momentarily followed) and provide written confirmation of that within 3 days, which would’ve been december 14th, basically 3 weeks ago. the site’s still up.
…
- miles
- anyway, all there really is to say here is that there isn’t anything to say here, and certainly nothing james and i can do for or with you, prior to you abiding by the DMCA and getting your lawyer back in touch with andrew’s lawyer. the DMCA’s a legal order from andrew’s team, 3 weeks late, not a suggestion, and there’s really not much andrew feels like saying or any details he feels like talking about until you’re back in compliance with it. the whole point of us sort of disconnecting a month or so back was specifically to get the lawyers hashing this out.
…
- GiovanH
- Ah, that explains it
- My current belief is I did honor the DMCA request as soon as it was received by taking down all the copyrighted assets, including the webapp. There’s still a website at the address, but it’s a placeholder that no longer distributes the assets. We wanted to confirm this with Andrew’s legal representation though, so we’ve sent Andrew a request for confirmation that we’ve taken down the claimed content, and ask if there’s any additional scope they’re claiming needs to be removed. Now I’m just waiting for confirmation from Andrew’s legal representation that I’ve addressed his legal grievance.
…
- GiovanH
- The point is I’m very much not trying to give anyone the middle finger by keeping stuff up. We processed the DMCA notice when it was received and the current understanding of myself and my representation is we’re in full compliance, although we’re still waiting on them to confirm they’re satisfied with that
- It was not at all my understanding that there was a concern that the remediation was insufficient, or anything’s current state still constituted any violation
- If Andrew’s representation has not had a confirmation from us sitting in his inbox from December, let me know and I’ll get it re-sent.
- Please do let me know if you see any asset packs still being distributed under my control and I’ll scrub them, although I’ve already scrubbed everything I could think of.
The point is I’m very much not trying to give anyone the middle finger by keeping stuff up.
- in fact, if it’s working right, I set the site to detect when people click links to pages within the webapp and redirect people to the corresponding page on the homestuck.com website instead
…
- GiovanH
- very sorry if people were under the impression I had taken some sort of defiant posture! I was trying to honor your request for me to send updates to your representation from now on, but word travels slow through laywers
- miles
- obviously im not andrews lawyer so i cant sum this up in a Legal Manner but to clarify (although reading the DMCA i feel like it’s pretty clear?) andrew and HS legal’s position is that no, having the site up at all is absolutely not in compliance with the second DMCA. the entire website is dripping with the homestuck IP, trademark etc, and the entire purpose of the site is to proliferate a tool used specifically to host all that material. the fact that it happens to not have those assets on there anymore is not at all considered by andrew or his team to be a sufficient or satisfactory response to the DMCA.
- i dont know the full text of that response or have access to it myself, i never read it, but again for clarity’s sake andrew’s position here is that having the site up and the tool up, asset packs or no, is a fundamental violation of andrew’s trademark, and the DMCA is an order to take it all down.
- GiovanH
- I have not seen this clarification! My most recent legal counsel was that what’s currently up was not infringing, but I may be one communication behind. I’ll call and see.
- miles
- ok, definitely do that sooner than later
- but again, for clarity’s sake, andrew and HS legal see having the site up as a defiant posture, so the number one step of amending that that i’d highly recommend doing like, NOW, is taking it down immediately
- GiovanH
- In the meantime my inclination is to take things down until I can confirm my position with representation
- Yeah, that
- Although my recollection is the last request was to keep the tooling up because the fork wasn’t done yet… I can definitely hide things now in response to what you’ve just said though
- I can’t speak to the soundness of any of the legal arguments (i.e. whether the claims are valid or not) but in this interim period before I get updated counsel on that, I’ll delist what I can
- miles
- yeah i mean im not here to speak to the legal arguments either, just to confirm that “compliance” here means taking it all down and, like you said, getting updated counsel and also preferably getting the lawyers back in touch pronto to discuss next steps
…
- GiovanH
- https://homestuck.giovanh.com/unofficial-homestuck-collection/ 451’d
- miles
- perfect
…
- GiovanH
- ok, good
- yeah, the DMCA just says “the webcomic Homestuck”, which is the part we’d done the takedown for
- so the remaining step will be to address whatever was added in this third message, which it sounds like is “everything else”
- GiovanH
- fwiw my status is I thought I was maintaining this patient, respectful public silence about this whole process. (also, I had a whole analysis piece written about HS2 written that I shelved just to make sure that in this sensitive window, nobody even felt like I was criticizing them.) sucks that that’s not at all what folks were perceiving it as. hate that kind of sitcom communication gap
These objections are, of course, very silly on their face. It’s obviously fair use to show a fragment of a Homestuck panel in a screenshot, and using the word “Homestuck” to describe Homestuck isn’t a trademark violation.
Despite this we still brought the website down. Not based on the text of the DMCA order or any legal request, but based on the description they said they would have liked the DMCA order to mean. In this, as in all things, I extended them every possible latitude.
[The Unofficial Homestuck Collection’s Lawyer], Jan 9, 2025 To address the present status: The website is currently entirely offline and will remain so until we further our discussion.
To address your points in order:
1) Thank you for your further explanation. While we do not necessarily agree that the website implies the completeness which bothers you, it will be addressed and clarified before we put the site back online.
2) Regarding the .gif files, we feel that a reasonable person could consider this a fair use, but rather than dispute it and to show our good faith we will remove them before the website goes back online.
3) Regarding the trademark issue, we feel it is fairly obvious to a reasonable person, including a participant in the relevant market, that this is a nominative use only, especially with the prominent word “UNOFFICIAL” proximal to the mark. We maintain that this nominative use is necessary to indicate to website viewers what the app is useful for and otherwise does no harm to, nor causes any likelihood of confusion with, your client’s mark. If you would prefer some alternate presentation or wording, please advise and we will do our best to reach a reasonable accommodation with you.We would also like to reach a reasonable agreement and accommodation with your client, as we feel that the continued availability of the app is mutually beneficial to both parties. We appreciate your position and will work to be more responsive in future to this end.
June
After some back and forth, we get another communication about a “settlement”, once again fixated not on any UHC-related harm but on Andrew’s anger over previous reporting.
[Andrew’s Legal Agency], Jun 16, 2025 After speaking with our client, Homestuck is willing to settle if several conditions are met.
First, the five blog posts I list below need to be removed. As you are probably aware, Homestuck fundamentally believes these five blog posts to be libel and we cannot move forward with any settlement without these being removed.
https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2020/10/03/the-hiveswap-fiasco/
https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2020/10/03/accountability-on-kickstarter/
https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2021/01/14/more-on-the-hiveswap-odd-gentlemen-debacle/
https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2021/06/30/the-sarah-z-video-fallout/
https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2021/11/11/polygons-life-after-homestuck-thread/Second, [Legal Name] needs to remove any Homestuck assets or links to those assets from the UHC site. We do not have an issue with the reader itself, but the Homestuck assets, including the torrent links on the Carrd site, need to be removed. [Legal Name] may direct customers to the official channels for the assets, which Homestuck will provide on the same.
Finally, the parties sign a release agreement which includes an NDA, an agreement the parties will cooperate with each other, and a non-disparagement clause. As part of the release agreement, [Legal Name] may release a mutually approved statement on his blog explaining the situation.
Of course since they’re hosting the assets themselves now, “the reader itself” is the only thing they could have a claim against. Meanwhile, remember how Homestuck was going to “move past” the blog stuff because it was obviously “unproductive?” They sure don’t. My understanding is that Andrew’s lawyer is thought well of in his industry, and I have no idea how Andrew managed to talk him into participating in this inane “libel” argument.
I will just let my lawyer speak for me here, because his response is an excellent summary of the situation.
[The Unofficial Homestuck Collection’s Lawyer], Jun 27, 2025 We are glad to hear that regardless of any settlement you do not object to the reader application. As I’ve written before we also believe the reader is non-infringing and we are grateful to have a clear confirmation that you agree on this point.
The purpose of my client’s website
is for the distribution and documentation of the reader application, the software you have said you do not object to. It does not currently distribute illegal copies of the protected Homestuck assets, nor is that its purpose. If that page links to another website that’s currently distributing unauthorized copies, such as the unaffiliated caard page, we can comply with removing those links if necessary. If you believe we are in error regarding any assets not mentioned herein, please advise. Note that since Homestuck is providing the same files themselves, the
could link to Homestuck’s distribution of the assets without any substantive change in content. Even without Homestuck hosting this specific file though, the Homestuck assets have been widely distributed for several years now with the full knowledge and even support of Homestuck and its executives, so my client modifying his page will not have an effect on the material’s availability. We acknowledge that this does not affect your client’s distribution rights, but we suggest that a simple license to distribute the asset pack with proper attribution and terms could be a reasonable element of any proposed settlement. That being the case it’s unclear what material matters remain for such a settlement to resolve. When [Legal Name] inherited responsibility for maintaining the project’s websites he had both explicit permission and explicit direction from Homestuck to continue distributing those assets and not interrupt the availability of the project. When your office sent us a DMCA request we took down all copyrighted material that could be considered infringing pending further discussion and agreement. In fact my client has gone above and beyond the requirements by de-listing the entire website while we try to resolve the underlying dispute. We have only recently restored the website for the reader application after being unable to reach [Andrew’s Lawyer] or any of Homestuck’s agents for an extended period of time, which we took to indicate a loss of interest in the matter.
Prior to the DMCA letter your office sent us, my client was also in the middle of a productive conversation with Homestuck about licensing the collection itself. A specific plan was outlined in which Homestuck executives would meet with my client, onboard them to the “Homestuck Independent Creative Union”, and then discuss approaches to collaborating on the existing project in both artistic and technical capacities. Unfortunately Homestuck shut this communication down before following through on this procedure or discussing details of such a license.
The topics that precipitated Homestuck’s ending of this productive conversation to the best of my knowledge were unrelated to the license or the project, but rather related to demands by Homestuck representatives that Homestuck take control of the project in its entirety (something they had previously agreed not to do) and for my client to perform a vague sort of public obeisance and/or apology, including regarding the blog posts you’ve referenced. In fact, the original DMCA request that precipitated [Andrew’s Firm’s] involvement was not a reaction to the distribution of any copyrighted material, but instead direct retaliation for not assigning Homestuck Inc. ownership and management control over the reader application. At times, to be blunt, we have questioned whether Homestuck is/was acting in good faith when it presents copyright infringement as its objection. Over the past three years, Homestuck has supported our distribution of the Homestuck assets currently being objected to, even directing people to download from my client this very same asset pack. They only stopped directing people to use us as a distributor for these resources after they decided they wanted to take ownership of the reader application. Again, we acknowledge that this does not affect your client’s distribution rights, but we suggest that a simple license to distribute the asset pack with proper attribution and terms could be a reasonable element of any proposed settlement if the copyrighted materials are in fact the issue Homestuck wants to address.
With regard to the accusations of defamatory blog posts, this is a topic unrelated to the question of copyrigt,[sic] but I will address it as Homestuck sees this matter as strongly relevant to their relationship with my client. First and foremost, we strenuously deny and disagree with any assertion that defamatory statements exist in these posts or any other work published by my client. [Legal Name] has shown me communications between him and Homestuck representatives wherein he repeatedly responds to these accusations with requests for clarification, and clarification was never given. Some of these conversations happened as part of the recent Homestuck Collection project, but some were as old as requests for comment made before the posts were ever published. In addition, we have communication from Andrew Hussie dated 2024-09-02 wherein he describes said articles not as containing any false statements, but as being “cynical” and “destructive” and needing to be deleted regardless of their actual content. This leads us to believe Homestuck does not actually believe there to be any actual defamation in these works either. If you and your client believe there are false or defamatory statements in the posts in question, please identify such statements with particularity, and we will review them and take any appropriate action.
When it comes to defamation, if anything, we have reason to believe that Homestuck and its agents have engaged in spreading false and defamatory claims about my client, not the other way around. It seems more likely that your client wants to predicate work on the condition that my client remove writing containing facts and/or opinions Homestuck finds unflattering, which is a very different conversation than an accusation of defamation.
Either way, we find it problematic to bundle the question of these posts with the idea of a settlement regarding alleged copyright infringement, especially since they predate Homestuck reaching out to [Legal Name] with offers to collaborate on The Unofficial Homestuck Collection project. I reviewed the initial series of communication between [Legal Name] and Homestuck. Before proceeding into the conversation at all, my client points out this risk of “bad blood” as something that could impact a working relationship, and Homestuck explicitly dismisses those concerns, unequivocally reassuring my client that past criticisms would not interfere with either licensing issues or Homestuck’s request to participate in some yet-to-be-determined mutually agreeable form. Homestuck clearly did not condition an association with [Legal Name] on the removal of this material, as their representatives themselves represented. As noted, if you identify particular defamatory statements, we will review them and take appropriate action. Such action will be taken whether or not we reach a copyright settlement, as my client of course does not wish to defame anyone.
Without disparaging or denying the actual rights your clients may have, in some ways, again to be blunt, they appear to be trying to use the alleged infringement as an excuse to pursue an inappropriate personal vendetta against my client and unlawfully seize management of The Unofficial Homestuck Collection, his own intellectual property. Despite all this my client has continually emphasized that his goal is not to engage in a hostile relationship with Homestuck. His stated goal is not to exploit or harm Homestuck in any way, but to simply create and publish his own independent and valuable work. In the event of unsustainable legal hostility from Homestuck, rather than pursue legal action, a much more likely scenario is for him to simply bow out, cease maintaining this project, and publicly explain why he has been forced to do. But we are cognizant of the fact that doing so risks creating new conflict and doing significant damage to your brand, which is why we’ve taken steps so far to try to work with Homestuck cooperatively in order to avoid that lose-lose scenario.
In my previous communication with [Andrew’s Lawyer], I discussed my client’s interest in pursuing a true settlement to resolve some of these claims and even potentially license his work to Homestuck for commercial use — something they’ve expressed a strong interest in — while preventing an avoidable conflict that would inevitably end with Homestuck framed in a negative light. We are interested in continuing that discussion, but Homestuck must move past trying to pursue a personal grudge in order to do that and come to an amicable and mutually-beneficial conclusion to this.
July
[Andrew’s Lawyer] (July) …
Let me be clear about where things stand:
- The recently reinstated Unofficial Homestuck Collection website is saturated with Homestuck’s protected intellectual property. This isn’t speculative; the site prominently features unauthorized use of my client’s assets, trademarks, and materials throughout.
…
- Your client’s trademark infringement is blatant. It appears in the domain name, the headers, marketing language, metadata, and across the website. There is no serious argument for nominative fair use here. The project offers a direct market replacement, creates consumer confusion regarding affiliation, and undermines my client’s ability to control its brand.
In short, your client’s copyright and trademark defenses are without merit. Their continued reliance on these arguments only increases their exposure.
As for the blog posts we’ve previously referenced - even if we were to set aside whether they are legally actionable (a point that remains under review), their removal is a non-negotiable prerequisite for any resolution. Your client cannot expect to maintain those disparaging materials and simultaneously negotiate a working relationship with my client.
At this point, your client has three primary options:
- Refuse to cooperate, maintain the infringing content, and face both informal and formal legal action, including takedowns, injunctive relief, and pursuit of damages. To be clear, this is not an abstract threat. We have already begun taking steps in that direction, including preparations to pursue removal of your client’s website and related content through their domain registrar, hosting provider, and relevant platforms. We will pursue every available legal and technical remedy to bring this infringement to an end and to hold your client accountable for the existing and resulting damages.
- Engage in the self-removal of infringing materials referenced in your email, and attempt to wage a public relations campaign. That approach neither eliminates liability for years of past infringement nor secures your client’s ability to operate going forward, nor does it prevent my client from undertaking any of the preceding actions. I’ll be blunt - we are not concerned about the court of public opinion. …
- Engage in a structured, good-faith resolution, which includes:
- Removal of infringing content and unauthorized distribution;
- A properly documented license agreement if your client wishes to operate legitimately;
- Removal of defamatory or misleading public statements.
This third option is the only one that meaningfully limits your client’s liability, preserves the work they claim to care about, and provides a clear, legal path forward. It is also, frankly, the path of least resistance legally, financially, and reputationally.
We are still willing to pursue that option, but the opportunity to resolve this amicably will not remain open indefinitely. If your client is serious about resolving this dispute, now is the time to act. Otherwise, we will move forward with the steps necessary to protect my client’s rights.
Your client must immediately remove the UHC website and Carrd, pending an executed settlement, release, and/or license from Homestuck.
This is overstating their position, to say the least.
Andrew once again categorically refuses to consider the particularities — there’s not even a “While X is true, Y” type transition.
Instead they’re simply refusing to address any of the issues we raised and just restating the most aggressive position possible.
For the entire period of time I’ve maintained the Unofficial Homestuck Collection site in a theoretically infringing way it was on the direct request Homestuck made in writing, as I’ve detailed here. That counts.
There’s also no trademark issue — we’re using the word Homestuck clear as a description of the thing itself.
The UHC is only ever described as unofficial and if anyone’s confused it’s because the Homestuck website was down. By the time we got this letter any blank page was a “direct market replacement” for homestuck.com
, since after getting it back from Viz they’d turned it off.
The best they can do is just desperately declare us “without merit”. It’s intimidation.
I’m sure this works on anyone who hasn’t already had to hire a lawyer but after review I know better.
They declare we “cannot expect” to negotiate a working relationship despite the fact that they themselves were the ones who offered that relationship without any of the newly described conditions. They throw in how little they care about “public opinion” while at the same time threatening a frivolous lawsuit unless I personally help improve Andrew’s reputation and clean up their public image. (For some reason people think he likes to threaten lawsuits — this must somehow be due to the Haters.)
But the most interesting thing is that the purpose of all this is to force me not to simply address the copyright concern, but for me to remove information I’ve published that paints Andrew in a negative light. And in so doing publicly imply the falsehood that the writing itself was objectionable. This is the same demand Homestuck already said could be ignored if I gave them control of the UHC. It’s just the same exhausting demand for a public show of submission again. They boast about all the attacks they’ve set up against me as if they’re impressive and strong, when each one is itself an offense. All these paths funnel towards the same demand for “removal of defamatory or misleading public statements”, which is just Andrew’s original grudge. It’s all about Andrew’s personal grudges through-and-through. Everything else is set dressing. Ultimately Andrew demonstrates that his worldview is that whether you should be allowed to exist should be determined by whether they’re happy or not.
Conclusions
This wasn’t a blunder. This wasn’t cognitive dissonance. This wasn’t a dumb guy misplaying his hand. This is an intentional strategy of practiced, coordinated abusive behavior. Andrew is entitled, arrogant, pretentious, and dangerous. What happened here was misconduct performed as a matter of regular practice.
These explicit legal attacks only cap off a series of social attacks that have been underway for years against various people, with various degrees of visibility. What I’m able to share now is not the extent of the data, they’re just the most freely shareable points of data. For everything I can write about publicly there are five private incidents.
I say this only to explain my confidence. To be explicitly clear, “dude, trust me” is not a valid way to criticize a person. Insisting that there’s a real but secret concern one can’t articulate but demands others act on is not behaving responsibly. In fact, it’s how an abuser uses their influence to alienate personal enemies without cause. I only point out that the specific evidence I’ve pointed out here (and elsewhere) are not the extent, but points in a cloud of stories that have mostly been hushed up.
“What is wrong with this guy”
I have people I have to call out for being aggressive and dangerous, which sucks, and I hate it. I hate that my time and energy is being consumed by protecting myself and others from predatory behavior, instead of getting to talk about art I enjoy.
Miles “rcktpwrr”
Miles is an odd case; he clearly works very hard to project this casual and friendly tone, but then he’s so obviously complicit in the worst of the lying and manipulation. Fundamentally Miles is what Andrew demands him to be: loyal. Miles appears to have been recruited out of the Homestuck fandom and is a self-described “diehard, longtime Homestuck fan” Now he’s working directly as a fixer for this mythic figure. I am of the opinion that Miles does bear some fault here; he knew what was going on, he knew what he was doing, he knew what he was participating in, and he signed his name to all of it anyway. Ultimately his willingness to act as a proxy for all Andrew’s worst qualities means he cannot be trusted, so it worries me to see him perform as some kind of liaison.
James Roach
James did not seem to be complicit in the actual offenses, but he did use his name and reputation to knowingly misrepresent the structure and function of the HICU label. James never acted as the Director at Homestuck. He was consistently kept in the dark as major decisions were made on his behalf, including documents his name was signed on. There’s this horse-in-a-hospital vibe around the whole thing, where James and I will be working to put out a cool thing for free, and then Andrew swoops in and causes a new avoidable problem. Andrew needs someone in this dedicated “damage control” role.
My basic read on James — based on very limited information, so this is only one perspective — is that his primary interest was keeping things running and making nice things. But this meant taking the path of least resistance when it came to appeasing Andrew. This means ultimately failing to maintain productive tension between the union of creatives and Homestuck, despite the trust people put in him to do that. I really don’t fault James though. From what I saw he took a cooperative stance that should have been reasonable — it was Andrew who abused that. My guess is his job was one where you have to agree with Andrew about everything, always, or you’re “asked to leave”.
Archival Disaster
It is obviously terrible for the archive to be unavailable, especially when the archive is the only usable copy out there.
Homestuck has communicated extremely strongly for years — both when Andrew was visibly in charge and now, when he’s a shadow leader — that they’re willing to cause however much damage they feel like causing. They do not see themselves as having any sort of responsibility, and don’t even see providing a good product as a goal that they have at all.
If Andrew is interested in taking the responsibility of custodianship for the comic seriously and making sure what they provide is the best thing for the community, that would be good. We already know for a fact they haven’t been historically: this is what necessitated we build the collection in the first place. And the union hasn’t been involved for long, but they have made it extremely clear that respect for their community is of no importance to them. They wouldn’t even begin a conversation about it, and when they sent the takedown request they said explicitly that the goal was the wealth of the corporation.
I cannot overstate how decisively Andrew choose the destruction of the archive over just being a decent human being. The Homestuck website could be up and fully-featured right now. Andrew could be selling copies of the UHC on Steam right now, for money. But the price tag for that was “please, please just be normal” and they spat on it. Homestuck had a clear choice here between doing right by people or maintaining an image of Andrew as perfect, and they chose the evil one.
Has to be said
I hate to be a negative voice, especially another time about this same franchise I love, but the only thing worse than exposing what’s going on here would be to cover it up and let it keep getting worse. Andrew would only keep harming and exploiting more and more people. We saw this same dynamic in the accounts from workers who were mistreated during the Hiveswap days: professional abuse was covered up, terrible practices were normalized, and so those practices and that abuse just continued to hurt more and more people, because no one would talk about it.
I don’t like the thought that this is going to negatively impact some of the good projects the HICU seems to be working with, but hiding what’s happening here would be grossly irresponsible and negligent of me. Although Andrew’s legal representative bizarrely asserted in writing that they don’t care about reputational damage, I still care about minimizing the harm this inflicts on innocents. I have done what I can to reduce collateral harm without covering up points people need to know. Ultimately I believe openness with the community about these incidents is foundational to real harm mitigation because it’s the only way to discourage the people committing the harm from continuing.
I am not throwing anyone under the bus here. Andrew Hussie and company have driven a bus over a crowd of people and I have to deliver the bad news to their grieving families. I know this news impacts a lot of people — some very severely— and so I don’t give it lightly. I promise I tried other avenues before it came to this. But Andrew doing this hurts more people than just themself, and as much as I want to I can’t protect everyone in his blast radius while being honest.
If Homestuck ever does come back and remedy the damage they’ve done that would change the story. But that’s a tall ask and I expect if they do anything they’ll do the opposite. Their primary goal is just going to be trying to socially isolate me, drum up more baseless rumors, and anything else to construct a plausible reason not to listen to my warning.
Freedom Motif
Because of the implicit threat of legal violence the relationship between a work’s copyright holder and its fan community is structurally antagonistic. The IP holder and members of the fan community have fundamentally different interests which sometimes align but sometimes don’t. This doesn’t mean the relationship has to be antagonistic in practice, but it means there is always an underlying potential for conflict that has to be reasoned with.
A fan community should be a symbiotic relationship. Fanwork can serve functions official work can’t, and the community surrounding a work is one of the main things that gives a work “value”, in a base economic sense. Likewise official recognition can be a good thing. Fan work can be elevated, talented creators can be brought on as part of official projects, etc. Official recognition can serve as a badge of honor.
But the deciding factor in whether the creator/fan relationship is healthy or exploitative is whether the community is allowed to be independent. One of the most important merits of fanwork, discussion, and criticism is a plurality of perspectives, and the ability to present and analyze work through truly pluralistic viewpoints. This is why things like fan comics, fan games, fan resources, and fan events (like Stuck At Home Con) have been so extraordinarily valuable. They represent legitimate plurality where the community manages and supports itself.
This is something Bambosh and I talked about in our conference panel. While it may make sense for there to be an official collection, this would be subject to the IP holder and their vision of how to work should be presented, potentially narrowing the focus and scope of the work. One of the obvious dangers is this can lead to the marginalization and demonization of specific viewpoints the corporate interest doesn’t agree with, regardless of their artistic and intellectual merit. The fan-centered archive and the creator-centered archive fill fundamentally separate functions.
If the IP holder insists that all aspects relating to discussion of a work go through one unifying authority, this is an assault on the community and represents an act of aggression against fan-run fan-space. If there is a demand that all work that exists be brought in under a single umbrella of control, this is a dangerous and precarious arrangement. It does not matter how much or how little work is encapsulated by official support. A unification of community spaces through a central governing authority with the ability to enforce policy and preference is an existential threat to that community.
This threat is a true danger even before that authority proves itself dangerous and untrustworthy by deed. The danger is structural; it is a trap prepared and ready to spring. Even if the current leadership is well-meaning, that power can be replaced and existing structures can be hijacked to suddenly abuse a good faith relationship.
Or, in extraordinarily blatant corruption like we see here, the control can be used to prevent valid criticisms of the work or the people involved in its management, as has happened here. In Homestuck’s case, not only is there this structural danger, Homestuck’s past and present leadership has proven itself to be not just potentially problematic, but actively and eagerly abusive of power it can acquire over community spaces. Especially toxic to fan spaces is Homestuck’s eagerness to blacklist and socially isolate people on its “enemies list”, leading to a sort of guilt-by-association virus that attacks the very foundations of community. Homestuck has consistently historically abused any power it can acquire for the personal enrichment of its few executives. It does this, like a parasite, directly at the expense of the people who support it.
Homestuck is Radioactive
The Unofficial Homestuck Collection didn’t have a right to exist. I’m not entitled to unilaterally distribute Homestuck. That’s why we took it down when we were finally asked. The problem here isn’t that I didn’t get what I wanted, the problem was the mistreatment and deception throughout, the inordinate amount of retaliatory violence that Andrew was willing to wield. The problem is the way Homestuck operates.
Homestuck is, at its core, a bad faith actor. They already were before this, but this incident has proven it beyond argument. People keep falling for the friendly act and keep getting irreparably harmed for their trouble.
Andrew is willing to be unimaginably hostile towards people. The problem is not that Andrew “hates their fans”, or is intentionally trying to destroy their community, or anything like that. The problem is that they’re willing to attack anyone if they see it as useful to the greater good of their own reputation. Over the smallest perceived sleight he will attack people’s careers, their professional lives, their financial stability, everything. I gave Andrew more chances to set themself right than anyone could have asked me to give him. I gave James every chance to set them straight. I gave his lawyer every chance to set them straight. If the leeway I gave him to be angry was not enough, no amount of leeway will ever be.
This is not an exceptional situation, this is the capstone to a long and consistent history of controlling and violently litigious behavior — not just over copyright issues, but for any whim Andrew is willing to pursue.
This primarily concerns fan spaces, but is in no way limited to them. I am convinced it is not a coincidence Andrew has seemingly never been able to work with people. This obviously includes big names like The Odd Gentlemen, Fellow Traveller, and Viz Media26, but don’t forget about art/music team turnover, Requiem Cafe, or that Andrew has already burned through two management teams on Homestuck^2 alone.
Not only is Homestuck radioactive, Andrew has gone to great lengths to prove that no matter what they say has changed, it will always be radioactive.27 I cannot overemphasize the fact that Homestuck will just lie outright. Whether this is because they’re confident they can retaliate against people who catch them or not, they freely do it. If Homestuck comes to you for anything, even if they’re nice, even if they make explicit guarantees in writing, even if they explicitly promise Andrew isn’t involved, their willingness to lie here shows you can’t trust any of it. They have gone through all the ways they could possibly be trustworthy, all the ways they could be expected to be reasonable, and systematically violated each of them.
If Homestuck reaches out to you to collaborate, to license work, or for anything else, cut bait on day one. If they start making takedown threats, let them follow through and announce what’s happened. It’s better than any alternative.
Don’t Support This
The point of this isn’t to get everyone riled up and angry. Don’t harass anyone over this, don’t start a manhunt. If you have a copy of the UHC please continue to enjoy it. I have no legal fund, even though I have paid multiple thousands of dollars out of pocket for legal defense during this time. (If Andrew still tries to sue me, perhaps I will need one.) But what you should do is not tolerate this behavior.
I still love Homestuck so much. I love the people, I love the community, I love the art. I love the various people on the Homestuck workforce! They’re not responsible for these problems, they’re just caught up in it.
Homestuck is art. It’s an important literary work. But it’s far past time for it to go full Hatsune Miku. Make the fanart. Love the comic. Talk about the work. Go to prom! Make conventions and celebrate the wonderful community Homestuck has fostered. Be excellent to each other. If you can get some sort of “free license” without putting yourself at someone else’s mercy, go for it. But it’s time for Homestuck-as-a-corporation to be fully over. Let the fan scene thrive, but if you see an outstretched hand, cut it off. For Homestuck to continue under any form of Andrew’s leadership is to condemn it to rot with the Harry Potters and Dilberts of history.
Andrew’s approach to this has put the Homestuck website and the possibility of an Official Homestuck Collection in an awkward position. Since Homestuck clearly approached me with the intent to use my work for these things, even an independently written Homestuck website rewrite is in the position of “scabbing” for this debacle. I would really like to be able to wish others luck in doing something similar, but instead I’m left in this position where if Andrew gets someone else to do this work, it’s more appropriate to call it out as an attempt to scab over this disaster. Whatever comes next will always only be “the thing that’s covering for what they did to the UHC.” I can only hope this was the worst such case in Homestuck’s history, but I fear there have been many others.
No one should be willing to work with disgruntled ex-cartoonist Andrew Hussie, including by proxy. At worst you’re at risk of entering into an abusive relationship and at best you’re propping them up and lending your credibility to someone who spends other people’s credibility like it’s money.
You especially shouldn’t support this right now, when the currently running major Homestuck project is running a Patreon whose money pays Andrew and Miles. Makeship Karkat isn’t worth having when he pays these salaries. Off the back of this story I’m just going to come out and make an explicit value judgment: you should not be giving Homestuck your money, and if you are you should stop. Homestuck has done half a dozen things during this process that individually warrant that. I wish they hadn’t, but they did. Putting them all together, I cannot possibly justify saying that continuing to financially support this behavior is reasonable. It’s not.
Hoping to go back to fun stuff soon.
With love,
- Gio
Related Reading
-
When this was first published it was written with the understanding Andrew identified as man, since at the time James Roach, Miles, and Andrew’s legal representation all used he/him for Andrew. I got several comments reminding me that Andrew has been using any pronouns; using he/him (as well as calling them a man) could be read as a transmisogynistic jab, which is not my intent. I have criticisms of Andrew here, obviously, but I want it to be very clear I’m not taking any cheap shots over identity. That’s not what this is about.
Let me know if I’ve missed a spot and I’ll fix it. ↩
-
Bambosh was also the frog ↩
-
For the sake of trying to reduce asset pack updates (because they’re extremely large files that people have trouble with) some later updates to the Application contain a few tiny assets to “patch” the asset pack, but those are considered minimal and non-infringing, and can be removed if needed. ↩
-
As the copyright holder I have the right to re-license the collection outside GPL3, so if they wanted to use it in one of the ways GPL3 doesn’t allow, I can enable that. This is the kind of thing I would expect their lawyer to have explained to them if they consulted with him properly. ↩
-
A quick note on these discord quotes; These are all carefully transcribed so they’re accessible on all screen sizes and on screen readers. As with all blockquotes an elipsis indicates a cut. I also do have very crunchy screenshots and other evidence for these, but collaging them in to a readable article would make for even nastier reading. ↩
-
I’m going to linger on these early moments to show you the tone but don’t worry, I won’t go this in-depth for every exchange of messages. I simply cannot. ↩
-
i promise you it is not ↩
-
I didn’t get to see this message until more than a year later, but it’s very sweet. Seriously, Bambosh? What a guy. ↩
-
Just about the only relevant piece of information that was clearly marked as confidential and so is bound by the NDA is my personal information.
- GiovanH
- One specific reply I do have to this is that I’m concerned with how casually personally identifiable information is being used here. Since it is not public information, personal details that were only shared for the purpose of this project like my legal name should be treated as confidential.
- miles
- so this information is going to absolutely be kept private
- GiovanH
- I was reminded just this week that I have people from homestuck circles stalking me and threatening and harassing my real-life family, so I have to be careful about that.
- miles
- yeah, of course. that info is never, ever going anywhere
- GiovanH
-
:
↩
-
There’s a very “Trump handshake” aspect to all this. ↩
-
I haven’t been spending much time on timestamps and date gaps, but it’s flatly untrue that I’ve stalled anything or even been unresponsive. Perhaps there’s a feeling of not making progress left over from the deadlock which they caused themselves. ↩
-
Another example of the “don’t make me hit you” reversal of victim and offender. Andrew doesn’t have to make any attacks, he’s choosing to do it. Discussed previously. ↩
-
Another example of using the creation of a UHC fork as a threat designed to punish rather than something they’re willing to maintain. Discussed previously. ↩
-
Andrew cultivates this strange inversion of Jester’s Privilege, where taking on the trappings of comedy and unseriousness shields the otherwise powerless jester from responsibility, allowing one to tell truth to power. Except in Andrew’s case the person claiming it is the one with all the power, and they’re using ambiguous Goofs to situationally infantilize themselves to dodge responsibility for serious harms they’ve caused not with jokes, but with professional malpractice. ↩
-
I know a common avenue of textual analysis is psychoanalysis of Andrews personal life. “Oh, it’s because his father…”, “Oh, it’s because his brother…”. I have never participated in any of this. I think it’s speculative and distasteful. ↩
-
Andrew can’t resist but try to throw Bambosh under the bus, something even Miles knew not to do. There was no “kneejerk snap”, Andrew directly began legal proceedings against Bambosh who rightfully disconnected from the project in response. Although Bambosh’s exit was sudden there was also no sudden takedown — the collection was down for a few minutes at most while we migrated the maintainer behind the scenes. But complaining about a takedown in the first place is absurd, because the very thing Andrew keeps threatening to do — and in Bambosh’s case, already legally demanded — is a takedown. ↩
-
Andrew also keeps modeling things as “leverage”; who’s under whose thumb, who’s gun is to whose head, which one is the alpha and which one is the simp. The reality, as I’ve already described, is we’re two people who would like things from each other, and we’re meeting to pursue mutual benefit. But Andrew simply refuses to work this way; he consistently demands power over others first. ↩
-
“But Miles can’t be responding to the settlement demands! You said those were sent in September, and this chat is from August! Are you making this all up?” Good question, no. Some of the docs were sent over earlier in August, which is the discussion here. September is the first date they were all available, which is why I attribute it that way. As I discussed in the intro, some non-impactful streamlining is necessary for this to be readable. ↩
-
A truly deranged thing to claim, given that the injection of the demand that I make a public statement is the most clearcut case of “dredging up old bullshit unproductively” I can imagine ↩
-
This is flatly untrue; the documents don’t detail any damage done to the brand and don’t explain any amount of “harassment”. At best, Andrew asserts it’s the case without explaining how. ↩
-
The document talking about Aysha, discussed earlier. ↩
-
I actually have no idea what’s being referred to here. It sounds like Andrew feels like somebody did him wrong but refuses to articulate what it was, which is behavior I’ve learned not to give credence to from him. ↩
-
Kohilace is fantastic and hopefully still a friend, even if some of their bosses are evil. Every opportunity I have had to work with them has been a delight. I have every reason to believe they were kept fully in the dark about all troubling aspects of this project, and anything they did as a part of this was a result of being deliberately mislead. We love Kohi. I hope very much that they are not hurt by any of this. ↩
-
In fact, according to Andrew, VIZ media “left the project and brand hanging out to dry a few years prior” to 2021, almost immediately after the original deal in 2017. ↩
-
An argument Homestuck could give was that this one public incident was the worst they’ve ever behaved, and just happened to be the one that was publicized. I don’t believe that for a second, but if it were true Andrew can prove it.
If Homestuck wants to disprove any of this, all they need to do is waive NDAs they’re using to censor people. Guarantee a representative sample of people he’s affected immunity and let them give their stories too. Let’s hear from the folks who interacted with Homestuck and then were mysteriously harmed for secret reasons.
Waive the NDA with Bambosh, let him describe what he experienced too. Let’s have open conversations with everybody. All they need to do to prove me wrong is open the floor, and all they need to do to prove me right is to keep up the isolation tactics and play damage control. ↩